Laserfiche WebLink
June 4, �975 <br />PLAPd�JING REPOR7 <br />CASE PJUMS�R: <br />APP�ICANT: <br />Lt�CATION: <br />ACTIOPi R�QUEST�D: <br />PLANI�IVG CONSIDERATIONS: <br />895 - 75 <br />Curtis L. Kehr <br />1983 DeSota Avenue <br />st. �aU�, r�r� <br />South of WloodYri 71 Dri ve between <br />Oxford S�reet and Victaria Avenue <br />(see sketch) <br />Division of a Lot <br />Rezoning from R-7 to R�2 <br />1.. The property �n quest�on has 200 feet of frontage on l��odhill Drive <br />(farmerl,� County Raad C) with a depth of 124 feet on -�he west side <br />and 110 feet on the east sicl�. The appl�cant proposes to divide <br />the 1 and i nto twa parcel s wi th 100 feet o-F frontage eacl� an 4Joodhi 1 i <br />Drive. The prQperty as you will note, is located immediately wes� <br />of the e�ementary school and north of a parking area servir�g the <br />apart�ent complex to �he south. A single famiiy home exists to the <br />ti�rest and across the street as sho�vn on the sketch. . <br />2. The appi�cant requests a rezoning f rom R-1 sing7e family ta R-2 <br />t�,vo--fami?y d4�re71ing for the purpose ai constructing a duplex on ea h <br />o� �1�e i�ra lots created by �he division: The proposed dupl�x design <br />incorporates a double garage on either sid� o� the struc�ure wi�h <br />a total building length of 71 fee�. This dimension on a orte hundred <br />foot lot bbvious�y prav�des adequate accomadat3on o-F the required t�n <br />foot set-back on either sic�e of the 1ots in q�estion. The large <br />scale plans of .the p.rop�sed structures inclt�ding architectural <br />treatment �rill be availabie at t�e Pub13c Hearings. <br />3. The prop�rties in questian cau7d of course <br />66.66 foot frontage lois on ldoodhi77 Ilrive. <br />property haUrever, con�tiguous to the parking <br />the east and the parking area to the south <br />of a reasor►ab7e duplex developrrzent for the <br />appropriate de5ign. <br />be div�ded into three <br />The location of th� <br />area of the school to <br />sugges�s �h� possibility <br />proper�y, assuming an <br />4. The i ni ti al app`1 i cati on 4�aas accompani ea by a peti ti on i n-Favor wi th <br />112 signatures. Many of the signatures were-from occu�ants of t��e <br />appartrr�nt house �o �he south. Since the f� 1 i ng of the appl i ca�i an <br />howeve�, the City has rece�ved a letter da�ed 3�ay 23, 1975 rescinding <br />approva7 by �arrEe o�F the previous signators. A copy o� thet letter <br />is attac�ed far your in�`orma�ion. A copy o� the Public Notiee mafTed <br />