Laserfiche WebLink
CI"TY 0� RQSEVILLE <br />Regular Meeting o� the C�.ty Council - July 7, 19750 <br />The City Council met on the abave date raith the following <br />members presente Mayor Linebarger, Cauncilmen Demos, Hess, <br />Brennan and G�xrleya <br />A-1 Brennan Nloved, Demos Seconded, that the minutes of the meeting <br />of June 23, 1975, be appx°oveda Ra11 Call, �1yes: Demos, Sx�ennan, <br />Curley and Linebargere Nayse None� Abstentions9 Councilman <br />Hessa Mro Hess was absent from the meetingo <br />B�1 Curley Moved, Brennan Seconded, �hat the request of Tusler Lodge <br />for rezoning from R�1 tio �-3�:y spe�ial use permit and cond�tional <br />use pexm�t at 1321 County Road B-2 be continued until �he meeting <br />of July 21, 1975 as requested by the applicant� Roll Ca].1, Aye�� <br />Demos, Hess, Brennan, Cux�ley and Linebargera Nayse IVone, <br />B�2 Curley Moved, Hess Seconded, tha� the request of Mr, �iay Kroiss <br />to withdraw hzs applzcation for rezoning from R-3A to T�i at <br />about 3030 North Cleveland Arrenue be approved� Roll Call, A�esa <br />I}emos, Hess, BrennanP Curley and F,inebargero Nayso None, <br />Demo� Moved, Hess Seconded, that Mro Ray Kroiss' request for <br />x�exoning �rom R�3A to R�1 and Prel�mina.r�y Plat at about 3030 <br />North Cleveland Avenue be appx�oved and a hearing be set on the <br />final plat for August 4, 1975o Ro11 Call, Ay�es: Demas� Hess, <br />Brennan, Cur2ey and Linebargero Nays:; Noneo <br />�-3 Demos Moved, Curley Second�ed, that the reQuest of Kenneth <br />Reinhardt for rezoning from R-1 t.o RA3A at 2395 Nox°th Dale <br />S�reet be approvedo Roll Call, �y�eso Demos, Hess, Cux°ley and <br />L�nebargera Nayso Brennan- <br />B=� Demos Moved, Curley Secanded, that Shafer Cont.racting Company's <br />reques� for special use permit at b44, 64b and 65b County Road C <br />be denied for the following reasonso <br />� <br />7 a30 .P.M. <br />�a Excarration of the property� would leave sZope grades which <br />are unsatisfactoryo <br />2a The "V" whzch would be gouged out af the hi11 wou�ld le�ve a <br />second hill south oi t�e existing hi17. and a gully which could <br />cause personal Ynjury as weil a� o�her problems �or the c�tyo <br />Three slopes would also re�ul.x compared to the one whi�h naw <br />exists, <br />3o Applicant o�fers no proposai for dust cantrol during �peration; <br />does not indicate which roads he would use in hau.lyng mater�als; <br />nor indicate what nis hour� o� aperation will be� <br />4o Applicant offers no plans for �he replanting af the trees and <br />shrubbery which would be remor�edo The trees wrhich now exist may <br />range in age from 80 to 100 years old and this grow�h rould not <br />adequately be replacedo <br />5o Applicant does not indicate tonnage or yardage he expects ta <br />excavate nor the aanount o£ time (meaning months and years) <br />required to complete the operationo <br />6� In measuring past per�ormance of' the applicant, the previous <br />special use permit issued by the Roseville Counczl called ior <br />MINUTES <br />TUSL,ER LODG� <br />RAY Ki�0IS5 <br />REQUEST <br />KEMVETH <br />REINHARpT <br />SHAFE4t <br />CONTRACTiNG <br />COMPANY <br />