Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />Case ;dum�er: { '�� 75 <br />Jur�z 4, 1975 � <br />5. <br />�. �, Page Tti•ra <br />��e pronerty to the rear and ihus prod�ce t�vo �ots 4rith a depth <br />of approximately 158 feet. The applicant P�'°rososed on�one�end <br />a sin�le home on tne 1ot as i-� is currently p p <br />gf the lot so as to acco�r�odaie a future divisiQn deveZopnent of <br />the secar�d lot at such time iE� the future as it may be possib�e. <br />Given the fact that the landowner im�r�ediately to t�e eas�t does <br />not desi re to sel l at thi s tir�°, there ti•roui d appear to be no oth?r <br />reasonable interim solution_ <br />You ti��ill note ioo, the existence of an existing se�der easement thru <br />thz property in question in�m�diately east a�f De1lwoQd �he�n�a�a�s <br />extended. ihis easement necessitates �h� pla�ting <br />�r;mediately ta the eas� and sau-th of .Rugg1es AvenuQ w�th ti�e 10� <br />sizes as proposed. In su�mary, it would appear -�nat �he deve�aper <br />propasal as presented represts a reasonable ��ray in ti�ih�cf� to develap <br />the properties in question. <br />0 <br />