1975_0804_CC_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

, Case Number: 8� 75 �, .�une 4, 197� Page T��ro In this ser�se, �t could generally be cor�strued �hat ihe proposal represents an asset to the existing singZe family homes on Uliider Street to tne nor�h. Ttie proposal also conte�plates the develop�ent of a complete cu7-de-sac circ�e at �ne end of �diidAr Stre�i t��ic� u�rau.ld likely be an advantage in t}�e terms of the turn around ability. 4. The devnlopment praposa7 ta the south af the proposed singie family Fiousing hati�rever, represents a more con�roversial iss�e. 7he office warehouse build�rtg proposed has a-�-Fices on the north sid� of the building and t�e west side. These off�ces �rill have t+�ea entrances tfl ihe building off of the Cleveland Avenu° side and three on •- the north side. A 7andscaped area is provided contiguous to �he building on these sides adjacent to parking proposed in a singl� roLr an the ��rest and north sides. The prop�sed structure is a single story, and thus may have some advantages in terms of i�s visual re7ationship �o t�e single fa�ily area versus a three story apartment de�elopment as pre�iously proposed_ The re�atzonship be�s�reen this proposed us� ancE the proposed single family area to the north can of cours.e, �e 6etter appreci a�ed ��nen u�e�ri ng tf�e 1 arger scal ° dra�rsings tv be presented at the h�arings. 5. Actuaily �he more serious impiicatians flf the r�zoning proposal as subm�t�ed are -its impact upon the ul�imai.e iand use bath to the east and tha sou-th. The 1969 Compreher�siv.e Plan recomm°nded industrial zone to the sou�hside of L�ydia Avenu� as extended east-�r�est to Cleveiand Avenue. The area to �he t�orti�, including the lat�er souti�erly t�rro tY�i rds of the property ir� questiQn 4•�as recommended for ap�rtnent deve�opment betar�en G1ev��and Avenue and the school site to the east. 7he origianal proposal for apartment develap�rent con�orm qu�te closely to that concept. 6. ii ti�rouid app°ar that approva� of the I-1 zone at praposed in �his appiication, would likely indicate �he extension of tn� industr�al ` zone for t�e property from Lydia r1IVET'iU2 to the s�outh line of the proper�y in question and on the east side of �he propased in�ust- rial area.be�reen tne property �r� question an� the pool s1te. 7nis of course urou�Ed a-Ffect the ultimate use o-F Parcels A and C iacated to tf�e east of tne site in question, part�cularly as it relates to -�he sauiherly 356 -Fee� of these parcle�. I�= t;►ese parce7s are can'ter�pl ated for fu�ure i ndus tural dev�i o�r�en� -�hen th e ques ti on of vehi cul ar ci rcul ation as �oul d rel ate to ihese pa�°cel s_ becom�s of cansid�rabl�e conce�^n. �'h� develop�ent of the southerly 35fi feet of Parcel A and C for industri al purposes coui d ti•rel 1 requi re th� r�eve�opmen� of an east-�rest street a� t�e sou�i� line of 4he pro�erty � in qUestion L�hich might t�en be ex�endz d sout��rly ta Lydia Avenue, or perhaps to �he north boundary of the I--1 zone approximate1y 230 . feet south o-F Lydia Avenu� as extended. Larg�r scale drati�ings of _ these im�lications �rill be presQnted at fhe hearings to assisst the