Laserfiche WebLink
�RWIN A, pETER$ON <br />ROHEF2T C. BELL <br />W]LLARp l.. GONVEFtS� <br />ROGEit A. JENSEN <br />KIIFZT P. WALTNER <br />W, TiMOT!-FY MALC}{OW <br />MARTEfd J, CpS7ELL0 <br />uaw oF�ic�s oF <br />PETERSON, B E L L & CONVERSE <br />1800 AMERIGAN NATIDNAL HA1ViC BUILOlNG <br />IOI �AST FlK7F! STR�ET <br />S'T. PAU�, fV11NNESOTA 55i01 <br />22�i-4703 [ 612 ) <br />July 31, 1975 <br />City Council <br />City o� Roseville <br />27Q� North Zexington Avenue <br />Rosevi].�e, Minnesota 551.�.3 <br />Re: City Hall Construction Fund <br />Our File No. M5--658 <br />G�ntlemen: <br />� <br />-7 <br />MINNPJIVOLIa <br />1081 300 LINE 9LliLD[NG <br />At the City Council meeting of July 21, 1975, we were asked <br />substantial.l.y the fo�.lowing question: <br />"In the event a change order is approved <br />does that approval indi.cate that the Council <br />waives any claim that they may have had for <br />sa�d change not being initiai�y in the plans <br />and specifzcations?" <br />We answer negatively. <br />A change order only affects the relat�onship between the <br />City and the contractor. The City's approva� of a change <br />order does not af�ect whether the architect shoul.d have <br />or should �ot have origina�.ly included said change in <br />the p�.ans and specifications. <br />However, in ordex- to a�troid any misunderstanding we suggest <br />that the fo3low�ng motion be rnade: <br />moves tha� the Mayor and Manager <br />execnte change ord�r No. and further <br />instaruct the City Man.ager to notify �he <br />architect that said approval daes not waa.ve <br />any claim ihat the City may have against sa.z.d <br />archi�ect for �ailure to insert said change zn <br />the original plans and specifications. <br />Very truly yaurs, <br />PETERSON, BELL & CONVERSE <br />RCB:gvp Robert C_ Bell <br />_,:,w...; . ,� <br />