My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0315
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0315
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2008 2:02:17 PM
Creation date
7/13/2005 4:38:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/15/2004
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session - 03/15/04 <br />Minutes -Page 3 <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan, Maschlca, Schroeder and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />5. Hear a Progress Report on the Twin Lakes Stakeholder <br />Panel (PF 3552) <br />Community Development Director Dennis Welsch asked if the <br />Twin Lakes agenda items could be shifted, inasmuch as Mr. <br />Shardlow was not present for Agenda Item No. 5 yet, however <br />all presenters for Item #6 were present. <br />Without objection, the Council approved the agenda change. <br />Community Development Director Welsch gave a brief <br />background about the City's efforts to redevelop Twin Lakes. <br />Mr. Welsch identified some critical tasks and issues facing the <br />City. <br />6. Consider Resolution on Twin Lakes Contract for Exclusive <br />Negotiations with Rottlund Homes and Hear a Report on <br />Progress to-date on Financial Strategies (PF 3543) <br />Jim Casserly of Krass Monroe, legal and financial consultants to <br />the City; Todd Stutz of Rottlund; and Dennis Welsch discussed <br />the model for a Master Redeveloper and the Master <br />Redeveloper's obligations under the contract. <br />Mr. Casserly spoke about the redevelopment challenges at Twin <br />Lakes. Mr. Casserly spoke about the use of Tax Increment <br />Financing (TIF). Some increment could be used for City <br />administrative fees, fiscal disparities purposes; thus, not all tax <br />increment in a TIF District goes for project expenses at the <br />redevelopment site. <br />Discussion ensued about the ramifications of the 2001 - 2002 <br />state property tax changes. <br />Councilmember Ih1an asked about the circumstances under <br />which TIF may be appropriate and when TIF was not <br />appropriate. Councilmember Ihlan asked about funding, other <br />than TIF, for environmental remediation. <br />Hear a Progress <br />Report on the Twin <br />Lakes Stakeholders <br />Panel (PF 3552) <br />Consider <br />Resolution on Twin <br />Lakes Contract for <br />Exclusive <br />Negotiations with <br />Rottlund Homes <br />and Hear a Report <br />on Progress to-date <br />on Financial <br />Strategies <br />(PF 3543) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.