CC_Minutes_2005_0718 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

() () ~P-,2".._"-..",, Date: 07/18/05 Addendum to Item: 7, To: Roseville City Council From: Neal Beets Re: Councilmember Ihlan's Questions about Environmental Clean-Up Date: Friday, July 15, 2005 City of . Minnesota, USA Attached is a memo from Community Development (Dennis Welsch \ Cathy Bennett) responding to Councilmember Ihlan's questions. I write to add those paragraphs from the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Agreement dealing with environmental remediation, with key provisions underlined. ........... ...... ................. ........... ....... ................... a. From City-Rottlund Redevelopment Agreement, approved June 20, 2005 Section 5.5. Environmental Remediation. (a) The Redevelopment Property is contaminated with certain Hazardous Substances. The plans for remediating the contaminated portions of the Redevelopment Property will be deseribed in the Approved Response Action Plan. (b) The City shall make available to the Redeveloper all existing reports, as- sessments and other data in the possession of the City relating to the soils and environ- mental eonditions of the Redevelopment Property. (e) With respeet to Parcels under eondemnation when the City has obtained eon- sent from the property owner or a eourt order permitting inspeetion, the Redeveloper and its agents and designees are granted permission to inspeet, analyze, and test such Parcels to the extent permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.041. The Redeveloper shall hold the City harmless from any liability resulting from the Redeveloper or its agents or designees entering upon such Parcels or performing any of the tests or inspections referred to in this subparagraph. (d) The Redeveloper shall have the sole responsibilitv for Environmental Remediation and soils correction and shall bear all costs associated therewith. The Re- developer shall perform the Environmental Remediation pursuant to the Approved Re- sponse Action Plan. The Redeveloper intends to seek a No Action Letter from the MPCA, but inability of the Redeveloper to obtain a No Action Letter shall not excuse the Redeveloper from any of its obligations hereunder.