My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0620
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:29 AM
Creation date
8/19/2005 3:26:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/20/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 06/20/05 <br />Minutes - Page 35 <br /> <br />language, interpretations and management of said <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jay Squires responded to comments from the <br />audience (Mr. Callahan) with respect to the official map <br />adopted and published as part of the ordinance, related to <br />those in the hands of staff. Mr. Squires noted that the <br />Official Map, as part of the City Code, Section 10.16 <br />related to shoreland management, established the <br />jurisdictional area as 300'. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough spoke in opposition to the motion <br />based on use of Eminent Domain and condemnation <br />proceedings. <br /> <br />Roll Call [12.3 - Final Plat] <br />Ayes: Schroeder; Maschka and Klausing. <br />Nays: Kough and Ihlan. <br /> <br />[12.4] Consider Repealing Ordinance No. 1213, which <br />established an Officially Mapped Alignment for Twin <br />Lakes Parkway <br />Schroeder moved, Maschka seconded, enacted Ordinance <br />No. 1322 entitled, "An Ordinance Repealing the Officially <br />Mapped Twin Lakes Parkway Right-of-Way in Accordance <br />with Minnesota Statutes 462.359." <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing requested staff's purpose in this motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsch advised that it was for the purpose of clearing <br />parcels of all encumbrances prior to creating a new plat. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke against the motion for similar <br />reasons she spoke to against the final plat. <br /> <br />Discussion included location of the Twin Lakes Parkway <br />and its alignment; buffer represented by Outlot A; <br />landscaping and berming proposed; and a Master Plan for <br />Langton Lake Park. <br />Roll Call <br />[12.4 - Repeal of Official Twin Lakes Parkway <br />Right-of-Way] <br /> <br />Ordinance 1322 <br />Repealing <br />Ordinance 1213, <br />Officially Mapped <br />Alignment for Twin <br />Lakes Parkway <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.