My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0808
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0808
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:34 AM
Creation date
8/23/2005 9:34:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/8/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 08/08/05 <br />Minutes - Page 17 <br /> <br />Railroad Management Company and Minnesota Commercial <br />Railroad, they indicated that a pathway behind transmission <br />power lines would NOT be approved. Ms. Bloom noted that the <br />railroad also has concerns about parking bays on their property, <br />but noted that the railroad felt those concerns could be <br />addressed by installation of a 6' high chain link fence along the <br />south side of the road adjacent to the parking bay areas. Staff <br />recommended that the 6' high vinyl-coated chain link fence be <br />installed to meet this requirement. <br /> <br />Revised Assessment Rate (with elimination of realignment <br />costs from assessable road costs, and with revised street <br />widths) <br />Ms. Bloom presented revised assessment rates the new 7-ton <br />road, with a total construction estimate of $1,462,428.71; and <br />estimated assessment rate of $24.11 per foot, reduced by $2.55 <br />from the previous $26.66 per foot estimated in the feasibility <br />report. <br /> <br />Boulevard Parking <br />Ms. Bloom noted she was not clear on whether the boulevard <br />parking discussion was a condition. <br /> <br />Discussion included additional City cost shares for the <br />realignment and MSA funds and impacts to future projects; <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing requested clarification from Councilmembers <br />as to their breaking out the cost for realignment, as he opined it <br />seemed to benefit property owners by calming traffic. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder explained his rationale; that while <br />curing the road calms traffic, it also enhances the park, provided <br />a better road design, slower traffic and overall provided more of <br />a regional than local benefit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan explained her rationale that <br />recommendations for making the curve were part of the Lady <br />Slipper Master Plan to enhance the park, thus her opinion that <br />cost-sharing should be across the city, rather than just the South <br />Owasso neighborhood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.