Laserfiche WebLink
MEMO: Jan. 9, 1975 <br />T0: City P�anager <br />�R0,�1: Assi stant �ngi r�eer <br />RE: Propose� Cons�r�ction at 619 H�inel �r�ve <br />The Engineering and Code Enforce�nent s�aff have reviewed the pro�osed <br />construction of a single-�an�iiy dr��lling at 619 fl�inel Drive, par�icu- <br />larly as it relates to meeting the lakeshore zoning requ�rement. It <br />is our finding tha� this would be acceptable and-meet such re�uire- <br />ments and v�rou7d not causz environm�ntal damages. ��r. Howard Dahlgren <br />of A�idwes� Plann�ng has also rev�ewed �he pronosed construction and has <br />indicated tt�at it does not conflict wi�h the lakeshore zor�ing ardinance. <br />ih� only vegetation of nate to b� a-Ffected wouid be one 14-inch oaEc <br />tree that is located at approximateiy tr�e one--half paint af the la�t. <br />This tree a�pears �o be approximateiy one-ha�f dead and its removal <br />wou�d be rather m#nor because oi` a grouping of ot�er oak trees wnich <br />wauld be located approximate7y l�5 feet from the home and beta�reen the <br />i�ome ar�d ��e 1 alce. The rear of ti�e s tructure wi i 1 be 1 ocated approxi - <br />nately the same distance f rom tF�e iake as the @XiS�illg structure to <br />'tHe north o� it and slightly farther away from the lake than �hA new <br />home �rh�c� is under construction to the south of i�. It v�i17 be locat�d <br />orti�igh, dry iar�d and in no way interfere w�th the shore]ine itself. <br />The owner h�as indicaied ti�at t�ere is no con�enplated filling or excava- <br />�i an at the shorel i ne i ts�1 f, so i t appears that no B�r'R perm7 t vrou7 d be <br />requi red. �t�her than some rou�i ne adj �ustments io the bui 1�ing pl ans an� <br />provisions f�r containing all stvrm �ara�er runoff on their property, there <br />are no prob7ems seen wi�h this proposal. <br />� �� <br />TP+iK <br />