Laserfiche WebLink
9 <br />!J <br />i <br />October 2, 1974 <br />� <br />PLANN�NG R�RORT: <br />CAS� NUMSER: 848-�74 <br />r� <br />{ <br />APPL.ICANT: CaunYry Kitchen lnternational, Inc. <br />2950 Metro Drive <br />Suite 304 <br />Minneapalis, Minnesota <br />L�CATi�N: South oF Minnesota Avenue, Wesi- Side of <br />Rice Sfreet (Se� 5lcetch} <br />ACiION ii�QUESTED: Rezoning �'rom E�--1 to B-� <br />PLANNING CpNSIDERATIONS� <br />1. 7he property in question was considered at the last regular meefing of the Pianning <br />Comrnission at wi�ich time it was suggested that the ppplicant }�ropose to rezone <br />tF�e remainder of �he land t}�af was purchased (to the west of tF�e property in <br />question} t� the "R-6" Townhouse Zone, and i�hat the app{icant work with the <br />City staff in preparing more accurate site plans, �iaying particuiar attention to <br />the mefhods of vehicular access c�nd resuli-ant grades of drives, pcsr#cing areas, <br />coni�iguous slopes, anc! its relationship ta Rice Street traffic movements. <br />2. The applicant has met with members of the staff reviewirig t�ese questions. li' was <br />ascertained that the cornbining of ti�e access points for ihe properties in i-he imrnediate <br />area is possible and desirable, ft was also del�erminec! that t�e soiution to the grades <br />of fihe access drive, and the ultimate grades of the property in question, �elated <br />c;lase{y to fhe �ontours and ultirnate deveiopmer�t of �he property to the west as we(I . <br />3, �'he applicant wc�s adviseci to abfiain additional topographical info�-mation regc�rding <br />the property in question and cantiguous properfiies as #�e basis for determining a <br />final appropriat-e soiufion to the access to the proposed developrnent and iheir <br />properties affected to t�e west� The Country Ki.i-chen people have not been able <br />ta obtain i-his additionpl sut-vey information in time tv prepared revised pians for <br />the Ocfober meeting of the Planning Commission. _We suggest therefore thafi the <br />Commission co�sider tableiing action on fihe proposal for a subseq�enfi meeting <br />in anticipaiion of the preparation of a worka6le solu�ion. Your Engineering staff <br />F�as been active in reviewing this development pro�osaE . Comments f�om them <br />wiEl be he�pful at the hearing. � <br />� <br />