My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_0213_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_0213_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2012 1:54:55 PM
Creation date
3/2/2012 1:33:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />qASFffih-hE <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Department Approval <br />Date: Feb. 13, 2012 <br />Item No.: 12.b <br />City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Discuss Strategic Planning from January 30, 2012 Council Meeting <br />BACKGROUND <br />At our first strategic planning session, we first discussed a synthesis of community aspirations <br />which Mayor Roe had compiled following his review of prior strategic planning and other <br />process documents. With input from other Councilmembers and Department heads and after <br />considering the Cobalt presentation related to the community survey, we added some additional <br />items. I have included that revised list, with the addition of one more bullet related specifically <br />to city governance (for discussion at next session), to the attached list. <br />We next had a discussion wherein we proposed various short and long term goals after <br />considering them in light of the following criteria: <br />Control: Those goals under the control of the City, not just Department Heads, but <br />collectively as decision - makers; <br />Impact: The relative level of impact or change that a specific goal would make in <br />our community; and <br />Resources: Whether the City had the available resources or could find resources to <br />accomplish the goal. <br />In the attachment, I have taken the list of proposals, and organized them with respect to which of <br />the aspirations they appear to reflect. Prior to our next discussion on February 13, 2012, we <br />should all attempt to complete the following homework: <br />• Review the listing and note if you have any disagreements regarding the <br />placement or wording of any of the listed items; <br />• Consider this list in light of the existing workplan, and come prepared to <br />recommend: <br />o What should be added to the workplan from this new list <br />o What should be deleted from the existing workplan, because it is <br />either accomplished or inconsistent with this list; and <br />o For Councilmembers - what three items you, individually, would <br />like to focus your work on in the upcoming year. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.