Laserfiche WebLink
{�� <br />Case �lumber: 877-%5 <br />M�rcF� 5, 7 975 <br />( <br />( <br />Page Twa <br />b. V'Ji�en fihe first draft�s of 3-he Roseville Zoning Ordinance were being prapared <br />in 19�7 and I958, if was confiempiated a� fhpt time ta require a rninimum of <br />]00 fee� of iot frontage in portions of the �vzsf�rn parfi of fh� City. Priar to <br />the c�doption of th° Orciinance in 1959, however, it was decided by fhe Planning <br />Comrriissian and Council i�o use a single Eo� size reqt�irement fihroughout the City <br />of $� �ee�- of frontage on infieri or 1 ofis and 100 feet of froni�age on a cor�er i ot . <br />rh�s was done wifh the recogniti�n i-hat any developer would be fre� ta develop <br />lots larger �han the minimum 85 feet of frontage required. �'he Ordinance exnresses <br />t}�e !ot size requiremen�- as a minimurri (as is i�s-ue of most Zoning Orclinances. in this <br />Country). The Ordinance makes no attem�t fio control a maxirr�um lot size, nor <br />does it require that �'he fo�s be of a consis�ent size if greai�er t�an the $S feet <br />and 100 ieef rr�inirnums. There is Eii �QCi COilSI[le�'C1ElI� C(U.�S�'101'! QS 'FO ��e extenfi <br />io which the City shauld or has i-he power fia resl-rict ��e division of land w�ere <br />the lats are far :n excess of the minimums required in the Qrdinance. <br />7, 7f�e appropria�e device for controliing such large scale and exclusive residentia! <br />areas is t�ai� of private deed rest�-ictians app�ied to the pro�erties. 1��V� uncterstc�nd <br />through conve�'safions wii'h rne developer of �-?�e prap�rty and some of i-he lo� owners <br />�'ha�- deQd restrici'ions have �een applied to Phe fots in fh� Gluek Subdivisinn. <br />Apparently, however, separate buir simiiar deed res�-rictions were applied ta er�ch <br />l „ parcel as tf�ey were sold and th�re are apparen�Iy no overall restrictions wi3�h respeci- <br />to division of �-h� land t�a� appiies fio the eni-ire p1af. T1�is poir�t shotsld be quesi�ionF' <br />wii�� �he ap�iicani and others tha�- rr►ay be interesTed a� the �earing so as ta asceriair`, <br />the degree �a v�rhich �Y�e privai-e restrici�ions control . Et suc� res�rictions hav� been <br />applied fo i-he proper�y, these restricf�ons t�en take pr�sidence over ;he zoning and <br />subdivision controis adoptzd by the Gify. <br />$. 1f wauld appear fihat inasmuch as the proposed division o� the land far exceeds the <br />sfiandards es�ablisi�ed as minimums by i-E�e Cii-y Ordinance, th�re wovld appear to <br />b� no reason w1�y t�e City sF�ould nof condone the division of tl�e land as �roposed, <br />i� th� pra�osad lors ar4 reasona�ly in scafe wi�h rh� 5iI1UII�f Iors in ihe plar. <br />f <br />�., <br />