Laserfiche WebLink
_2_ <br />ME��iO: June 2�, 1974 <br />A pariion of the rationale behind why the �eneral propertu tax should <br />be uti7ized to pa.y for retiring th�� specia7 assessment bond is that <br />nane of the city properties 4vas s�ecially assessed for the benefits <br />rnceived b.y havin� the water �acilities brought to it or ran by it. <br />There must aiso be sonie means available from v�hich to offset the <br />difference b�tween actuai cost af do3ng projects and th� front-foot <br />assessments levied agair�st the private prop�rtv owners. Other portions <br />of the �eneral property tax contribution might reflect construction of <br />tf1� contral �Faci 7 i ti es , to�rers , etc. , and the benef� t that the general <br />public gets, even if no-� hooked ir�to the water system through having a <br />fire fighting capab�iity available. The operating r�serve fund is re- <br />quired to have monies avai�able in the event of an unforeseen break- <br />down i n part of tl�e faci 1 i tv that woul d req ui re i n�medi ate expendi tures , <br />plus a replacement of portions of ttie system which vaauld nvt �e assessed. <br />It is recommended tl�at this matter be reviewed b,y yourself and the Council, <br />and an opportunity be given for questio�s and answers to be exchanged <br />among all parties and a dec�sion reached as expeditious7y as possible. <br />If an,y a7ternative is selected which would result in altering the rates <br />for water biilinc�s, it is strongly suggested that this �� dane by the <br />meeting of July 15, so that the new rates could be made retroactive ta <br />June 1, as was our St. Paul cantract and this adjustment reflected in <br />the billings tvhich ►uould cover that per�od. <br />