Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br />OF CITY COUNCIL <br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, Mirmesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on Monday, the 26th day of <br />September, 2005, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Maschka, Schroeder, Ihlan, Kough, and Klausing and the <br />following were absent: none <br /> <br />Councilperson Maschka introduced and moved the adoption of the following resolution: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 10336 <br />RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORTS <br />FOR ROSELA WN AVENUE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the street construction needs of Roselawn Avenue in the <br />City and has tentatively selected the segment of Roselawn between Snelling and Hamline <br />Avenues for reconstruction in 2006; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve this section of City of Rosville street system as described <br />above by completing the following work: sidewalk construction, bituminous paving, concrete <br />curb and gutter, storm sewer, and necessary appurtenances, and to assess the benefited property <br />for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Mirmesota Statutes, Section <br />429.011 to 429.111: <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Mirmesota <br />as follows: <br /> <br />I. The segment of Roselawn Avenue between Snelling Avenue and Hamline Avenue is hereby <br />approved for consideration of reconstruction. <br /> <br />2. The proposed improvements are referred to the City Engineer for study and she is instructed <br />to report to the Council with all convenient speed, advising the Council in a preliminary way <br />as to whether they should best be made as proposed or in cormection with some other <br />improvements, and the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption ofthe foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br />Councilperson Kough and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor <br />thereof: Maschka, Schroeder, Ihlan, Kough, and Klausing and the following voted against <br />the same: none <br />