My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0926
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:59 AM
Creation date
11/21/2005 3:22:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/26/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meetiug - 09/26/05 <br />Miuutes - Page 21 <br /> <br />the limited space for the driveway. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson requested City Council action on two <br />separate issues before considering voting on the previous motion: <br />that of the variance request; and that of the Minor Subdivision. <br />Mr. Anderson noted that, if the City Council chose to deny the <br />variance requests, they would need to establish their own <br />findings as a body for doing so, to allow staff and his office to <br />draft written findings within the 60-day review time frame. Mr. <br />Anderson advised that policy issues for considering the minor <br />subdivision could be addressed separately. <br /> <br />Discussion included the October 2, 2005 60-day review deadline; <br />extension of the 60-day rule; and preferred action for the motion <br />currently being considered. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson advised the Council could rule the <br />motion tabled, or the maker could withdraw the motion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed, as the maker of the motion, to <br />table the motion with the understanding findings for denial as <br />discussed tonight would eventually be adopted. <br /> <br />Ihlan moved, Schroeder seconded, a motion to table <br />consideration of this item until the regular Council meeting of <br />October 24,2005. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Maschka; Schroeder; Ihlan; Kough and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Schroeder seconded, a motion to extend the 60- <br />day time frame for consideration of the request; and direct staff <br />and the City Attorney to send written verification to the applicant <br />extending the 60-day time limit for further consideration of the <br />request. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Maschka; Schroeder; Ihlan; Kough and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing explained that the Council must create findings <br />that demonstrate a hardship. This would be in dispute with those <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.