My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0926
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:59 AM
Creation date
11/21/2005 3:22:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/26/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 09/26/05 <br />Miuutes - Page 26 <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />Continued Discussion of 2006 Budget <br />Councilmember Ihlan requested further budget discussion and <br />review of her questions, specifically related to the list of new <br />spending obligations in the City Manager Memo and spreadsheet <br />provided in July of 2005. Councilmember Ihlan offered to <br />provide staff with a list of questions for discussion at a future <br />Council meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough reiterated his request from a previous <br />Council meeting to have the City Manager return to the City <br />Council with recommendations for a 5% budget increase without <br />employee reductions or layoffs. <br /> <br />Kough moved, Ihlan seconded, to instruct the City Manager to <br />return with recommendations for a 5% budget increase, without <br />employee reductions and/or layoffs. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka, in conjunction with the motion, <br />requested revised numbers based on a 2.5% cost of living <br />adjustment (COLA) for employees; and a phased-in non-union, <br />wage step adjustment over a two-year period. Councilmember <br />Maschka also sought impacts to the projected $95,000 cost for <br />dispatch services, lacking a contract or decision at this time. <br /> <br />Discussion included previous reductions in COLA, and <br />adjustments needed during union negotiations and arbitration; <br />status of current negotiations and union contracts; current <br />contract language and fonnulas for the 4ger's contract; and long- <br />term economic solutions. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of the motion, with the <br />understanding that staff had made recommendations to the City <br />Council to achieve a 5% increase, which involved eliminating or <br />not replacing some positions; and whether we may retain <br />employees but not have the resources to utilize those employees. <br /> <br />Finance Director Miller advised that staff would prepare the <br />numbers without the variable in reducing the workforce. <br /> <br />Continued <br />Discussion of 2006 <br />Budget <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.