Laserfiche WebLink
� MiD"V'U'��3T 7r-'.L�.�-3.1v s.�e ,�.lv wr .c�.i�., _. .�..�.��...�.t_�._._ , -- - — <br />+�; <br />L A N D P L A N t�i t id G A N b li R B A N R E 5 f A R C H C O N S U t� A N T S <br />i� 2101 Hennepin • Minnea�olis, PJl+nnesota 554C?a • Tel��hanz: (6i2) 3i43Cf3fl <br />� Noverr+ber 1�, 1974 <br />r <br />% b <br />t r <br />� <br />NIEM�RANflUM <br />TO: Ra3eville City Cauncil <br />Attention: .i irn Andre, City Nlanager <br />�ROM- Midwest {'3anning ar�d Research, Inc , <br />SUBJ�CT: Yoava Klucsar Mobils Home Park <br />1. Mr. David Sellegren, ai�tocney for `Paava Klucsar met wii�l� ��e staff on <br />Wednesday, November 13th fia review a revised pPan and ac�corr�pany�ng <br />3etter delivereci to the City a few days before. A copy of the iet�er �s a�t�ached, <br />which you will note lists seven items of change in ths plu;�. . <br />2, Each of these iters�s sp�aks to areas of cancern review�d with ;h� applican� prior <br />to submis5ion to the Piann�ng Commission. The applicant reques��c� that Yv� refer <br />the plan ta the Pianning Cornr�►ission so that they could �?-a�t to ?�hes� sugges�-iona <br />(see attach'ec! report far O�tober 2, 1974 Pianning Commissior� meetingj. <br />3. Witl,out tl,e changes beinr� presented (and no indication ai- t�e tsm� af ihAir <br />being considered) the Planning Commission voted aga±nst approva(. Und�r t�zs� <br />conditions ws sugges�' �'he Co�ncil consider referring #�he a�plicafiion ��ck t� t�h� <br />Planning Commission ta a�low a fair evaluation and recommer�dation by i��� <br />Planning Com�tission. <br />4. We also suggest ihat in the event the City appraves the pian in same form, that <br />the underlying zane be changed frnm a B-3 category to a"Mobile Home Dis#r�ct" <br />to avoid i�l�� problern of extending a B-3 zone subsfiantid��y wii-hin i-he contiguou5 <br />re5idential areas. The �-3 x�ne was left on the pro�erty in 1959 so as to ailow <br />(and encourUge} the owners ia change the land use if fh�y so desired (frequent�y in <br />the owners best interest in the case of small, substandard mobile horne courts. <br />5. Mr. Seilegren verbally agreed with the concept of changing the underlying zone <br />in the event the mabiie h�me court is approved. <br />