My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_1017
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_1017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:28:04 AM
Creation date
11/21/2005 3:37:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/17/2005
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session -10/17/05 <br />Minutes - Page 18 <br /> <br />their expertise m evaluating environmental and/or recycling <br />Issues. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson reminded and cautioned <br />Councilmembers that the actual proposals they had received <br />were considered private data; and that only the analyses and <br />judgments were public information. <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />Discuss RoseviIle's Liquor Code <br />Finance Director Chris Miller reviewed the City's current off- <br />sale liquor licenses available, noting that there were ten allowed <br />under City Code and nine were currently in use. Mr. Miller <br />noted that staff had recently received an application for the tenth <br />and final license; and expected the request to come before the <br />City Council in the near future, subject to planning and zoning <br />reVIew. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller noted that staff had been advised that at least one <br />prospective commercial entity within the new Twin Lakes <br />Redevelopment Area had expressed interest in obtaining an off- <br />sale liquor license. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller reviewed State Statutes; City Code, Ordinance 956 <br />enacted in 1984; and the inability of staff to identify the specific <br />rationale for setting the maximum off-sale licenses at ten; but <br />speculated on several possible reasons. <br /> <br />Staff sought Council direction as to whether Code amendment <br />should be considered to increase the number of off-sale licenses. <br /> <br />Discussion included local preferences; type of licenses and <br />establishments; health, safety and welfare concerns; market <br />forces; competition and balance; quality of life and community <br />vision issues; and whether the Council wished to take action at <br />this time, rather than making a decision hinging on an exact <br />applicant coming forward and implications. <br /> <br />After further discussion staff was directed to return to the <br />Council with a proposed amendment to City Code raising the <br />number of applicable off-sale liquor licenses. <br /> <br />RoseviIle's <br />Liquor Code <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.