My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-02-09_PR_Comm Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2012
>
2012-02-09_PR_Comm Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2012 10:17:13 AM
Creation date
3/7/2012 10:17:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br /> 2 MINUTES OF MEETING OF FEBRUARY 9, 2012 <br /> 3 ROSEVILLE CITY HALL—6:30PM <br /> 4 <br /> 5 PRESENT: Azer, Diedrick, Doneen, Etten, D. Holt, M. Holt, Pederson, Ristow, Simbeck <br /> 6 ABSENT: Boehm called ahead with excused absence <br /> 78 STAFF: Anfang, Brokke <br /> 9 1. INTRODUCTIONS/ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> 10 FORParks Representatives in attendance, Janet Thul, Luella Zibell, Nancy Robbins and Marilyn Di <br /> 11 Martino presented the parks and recreation commission and staff a check for $50,000 to replace the <br /> 12 fountain in Lake Bennett, make improvements and upgrades to the interior of the Nature Center and <br /> 13 add/replace benches in Central Park. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 FORParks has had a long standing relationship with Roseville Parks &Recreation. Friends of Roseville <br /> 16 Parks has been very successfi l raising money over the years resulting in substantial contributions to the <br /> 178 Roseville Parks system over the past 40 years. <br /> 19 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—JANUARY 3, 2012 MEETING <br /> 20 Minutes for the January 3, 2012 meeting were approved unanimously. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 3. MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DISCUSSION—PARK& RECREATION RENEWAL <br /> 23 PROGRAM <br /> 24 Jason Etten briefed the Commission on the first two Renewal Program Community and Neighborhood <br /> 25 meetings. <br /> 26 • The January 25th included information sharing on the 2012 projects and an overview of projects <br /> 27 and timelines for the four-year Renewal Program. <br /> 28 • On February 8th the Lexington Park Neighborhood& Community meeting included sharing the <br /> 29 previously developed park master plan, updates on projects scheduled for 2012 and feedback <br /> 30 from the community on their ideas for Lexington Park. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Brokke discussed the Best Value Procurement Process and how it will be used by the Renewal Program. <br /> 33 Jeff Evenson and Brad Tullberg from the Parks and Recreation staff along with Kris Giga from Public <br /> 34 Works will be trained in the Best Value principles and processes by Arizona State University. Their <br /> 35 training will not only be put to use by the renewal program but will also be available for other city-wide <br /> 36 development projects. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Etten recognized the Council's unanimous support of the Best Value Process. Best Value application can <br /> 39 be applied to most everything we do. This is a broad, new way of thinking and working with huge <br /> 40 potential for the City of Roseville. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Brokke updated the Commission on the status of the Renewal Program fiunding. The appeal hearing took <br /> 43 place February 8. No decision was made. The courts have up to 90 days to make their decision. Staff and <br /> 44 volunteers are respectfi lly and cautiously moving forward. We will do as much as we can without <br /> 45 spending much money and working internally. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Dave Holt inquired into how the possible 90 day will affect fi ture bond fiunding. Lonnie did not have an <br /> 48 answer and would guess that nothing more would be done until there is a riling. <br /> 49 We are looking to leverage Renewal Program funds through grants— staff are working to submit an <br /> 50 application for Legacy funds for a Langton Lake shoreline and forest restoration and an application for a <br /> 51 Community Forestry grant to add to or replace public trees. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.