Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Regular Meeting -11/14/05 <br />Minutes - Page 17 <br /> <br />in 2006. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka opined that, while it had fundamental <br />flaws with reductions in reserves and spending deferrals, it <br />appeared that the Council consensus was for a 5% levy increase. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough opined that reserves were not necessary, <br />except for emergencies, and suggested funds be transferred <br />between departments as indicated. <br /> <br />Finance Director Miller advised that the City Council didn't have <br />unilateral discretion to transfer funds, due to state statute and <br />legal restrictions, except in the General Fund for core services <br />(i.e., police, fire and streets). Mr. Miller reiterated that the <br />interest earnings from reserves were used to fund the current <br />year's budget, with an estimated $1.5 million in those interest <br />earnings being used to provide current services. Mr. Miller <br />cautioned that spending of the reserve would have a dual effect <br />with the overall financial condition weakened, and the revenues <br />removed from sustaining current services. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough spoke in support of eliminating club <br />dues, and cost of a community survey; and opined the need to <br />use reserves only in an emergency. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder, for the record, noted that he had not <br />been in favor of a 5% levy increase; and was still proposing a <br />3.7% levy, and would continue to do so. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing also clarified that he had only consented to a <br />discussion of a 5% levy increase, and did not interpret the vote at <br />that time as "unanimous" for that percentage increase. <br /> <br />Ihlan moved, Kough seconded, setting the 2006 budget at a levy <br />increase not to exceed five percent (5%). <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing requested clarification by Finance Director <br />Miller on what action the Council could take tonight; with Mr. <br />Miller indicating that the Council had discretion to signal, by <br />motion or resolution, at tonight's meeting their intent, but that <br />formal action by resolution would be required at the December <br />