Laserfiche WebLink
<br />History of Project Delivery <br />Problems Encountered <br />Project Design Time Budget <br />and Solutions Devised <br />(months) <br />Ultimately, “Best Value” is <br />ContractActualContractActual <br />delivered through City- <br />Burnsville Comprehensive <br />controlled scope and <br />Surface Water Management 13 32 $75,900 $293,638 <br />schedule. <br />Plan Update <br /> <br />Chanhassen Surface Water <br />The table to the right <br />24 24 $300,300 $343,100 <br />Management Plan Update <br />summarizes four surface <br />Vadnais Heights Surface <br />water management planning <br />Water Management Plan 7 28 $43,500 $43,594 <br />projects, three of which are <br />Update <br />included in our client <br />rd <br />Six Cities WMO 3 <br />surveys. As the table <br />14 18 $60,000 $78,000 <br />Generation Plan <br />illustrates, projects routinely <br />exceed budget and/or <br />Burnsville Comprehensive Surface Water Management Plan Update <br />schedule. The discussion that <br />follows provides an <br />The Burnsville contract was amended seven times based on request <br />explanation for the overruns. <br />additional information and analysis. Modeling was not part of th <br />In all cases, the client <br />scope but modeling was found to be necessary once the project wa <br />approved the changes in <br />underway. Similarly, the City saw value in completing water quality <br />scope and schedule. <br />monitoring to characterize storm water quality. The project addr <br /> <br />localized flooding in the northeast part of the City during the <br />Even with delays in plan <br />process – which almost doubled the size of the contract. Staff changes <br />adoption, one of the <br />played a part in the schedule, impacting staff responsiveness and <br />important early deliverables <br />introducing new ideas and philosophies after the project was und <br />is the implementation plan. <br />The number of meetings with the public and Council increased <br />This tool provides value in <br />advance of formal plan significantly from the original scope. <br />adoption by the Council. <br />Chanhassen Surface Water Management Plan Update <br /> <br />The Chanhassen project had a very detailed scope and a significa <br />Project budgets can be best <br />amount of field work. The initial budget reflected the effort re <br />managed by completing <br />The project was finished on schedule. The increase in project bu <br />separate special studies as <br />independent projects, rather <br />due primarily to several special studies being requested during the <br />than amending the planning <br />planning process. <br />contract as is often the case. <br />Vadnais Heights Surface Water Management Plan Update <br /> <br />The Vadnais Heights project came in on budget. However, plan ado <br />was delayed 21 months. Staff was unavailable during plan review <br />illness. When staff was available, the plan adoption was a low priority <br />they were able to proceed with implementation without adoption. Plan <br />adoption was delayed to coordinate with the City’s Comprehensive <br />rd <br />update. Adoption was further delayed by 3 Generation Planning efforts <br />by the two watersheds in the City. <br />rd <br />Six Cities WMO 3 Generation Plan <br />The project was delayed in order to gain review agency involvement and <br />to incorporate a Technical Advisory Panel, which was not in the <br />BWSR required a Citizen Advisory Committee, but the member cities had <br />a difficult time in getting public interest and participation. T <br />review and response to comments was not delayed despite the revi <br />agencies asking for information goals, policies and implementatiitems <br />that had not been previously communicated. <br />| page 21 <br />firm background and qualifications <br /> <br />