Laserfiche WebLink
extend the coverage of its self insurance to afford protection in excess of any limitations on <br />liability established to law. Unless expressly provided in the ordinance or resolution extending the <br />coverage, the statutory limitation on liability shall not be deemed to have been waived. <br />The Minnesota Federal District Court has held even if <br />Learn More <br />cities do not enact an ordinance or resolution indicating <br /> <br />that they are self-insured or members of a self-insurance <br />See Reimer v. City of Crookston <br />pool,if the evidence establishes membership in LMCIT or <br />and Crookston Public School <br />other self-insurance pool, then the statutory tort caps are <br />District #593, 2003 WL <br />applicable unless expressly waived by the city. <br />22703218 (D. Minn. 2003) for <br />more information. <br />The LMCIT policy documents specifically state that <br />although the city may have elected to purchase coverage <br />in excess of the statutory limits [to cover non-tort or federal claims], the city has opted to not <br />waive the tort cap limits. Thus, unless city expressly waives tort cap liability limits, purchase of <br />excess or additional coverage will not affect the statutory tort cap limit. Please refer to the <br />attachment entitled “LMCIT Liability Coverage Options, Liability Limits, Coverage Limits and <br />Waiver” for complete discussion on these issues. <br />Multiple Claimants and the Municipal Tort Caps <br />35 W Bridge Collapse <br />Learn More <br />On August 1, 2007, the I35W Bridgespanning the <br /> <br />See McCarty, et. al. v. City of <br />Mississippi River near downtown Minneapolis collapsed, <br />Minneapolis, et. al., 654 N.W.2d <br />resulting in the death of 13 people and injuring over 100 <br />353 (Minn. App. 2002) for more <br />others. <br />information. <br />The Minnesota Legislature deemed,“the collapse was a <br />catastrophe of historic proportions…No other structure owned by the state has ever fallenwith <br />such devastating physical and psychological impact on so many.” <br />Since the state owned and maintained the I35W Bridge, it was the primary target defendant. <br />However, the state wasprotected by an individual tort cap of $300,000 per individual claimant as <br />well as a $1 million per occurrence cap. There was simply no way to adequately compensate the <br />179 claimants from that tort cap pool. <br />Learn More <br />To avoid a potential constitutional challengeto the tort cap <br />limits and to attempt to provide compensation for the <br />See Minn. Stat. 3.7391-7394 <br />victims of the I35W Bridge collapse, the Minnesota <br />signed by Governor Pawlenty on <br />Legislature enacted special legislation to deal with this May 8, 2008. <br />tragedy. <br />The essential terms of the bridge fund are as follows: <br />Non-liability based fund determined claimantsdidn’t need to establish fault. <br />State individual tort cap retroactively adjusted to $400,000 effective August 1, 2007. <br />7 <br /> <br />