Laserfiche WebLink
RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION <br />WHEN LMCIT DENIES A LIABILITY CLAIM <br />When the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) denies a liability claim, it is usually <br />not an issue of coverage  i.e. whether or not the citys LMCIT liability coverage covers the claim. <br />Rather, the issue is liability; that is, is the city legally lia <br />claim? <br /> <br />A scenario <br />A water main breaks and your city’s sewer system backs up into several homes causing major <br />damage; or someone falls and isinjured on a city sidewalk; or a tree falls in a windstorm and <br />damages a car. A citizen has a loss and is looking to the city to pay for it. Your city has liability <br />coverage through LMCIT, so you report the claim to LMCIT –and the claim is denied. City <br />officials quickly hear from angry citizens demanding to know why LMCIT won’t pay for such <br />losses and what the city is going to do about it. <br />LMCIT Background <br />LMCIT provides liability coverage toover 800Minnesota cities. LMCIT is not an insurance <br />company –it is a cooperative self-insurance organization of cities. The idea behind LMCIT is that <br />rather than paying premiums to an insurance company, the cities pool those funds and use them to <br />cover claims. Any funds LMCIT collects from its members that are not needed to cover losses or <br />expenses are returned to member cities as dividends. LMCIT has returned over $210million in <br />dividends to its member cities since 1987. <br />Something to Think About <br />About liability <br /> <br />In order for the city to be liable <br />When a third party makes a claim against the city and the <br />for someone elses damages: <br />city submitsthat claim to LMCIT, the key issue is liability. <br />1.The city must have been <br />It’s important to remember the city isn’t automatically <br />negligent. <br />liable simply because the injury occurred on city property, <br />2.The damages must have been <br />or because city equipment or personnel were involved. <br />caused by the citys <br />negligence. <br />It’s very much an over-simplification, but, in general, for <br />3.It must not be one of the <br />the city to be liable for someone else’s damages, three <br />areas in which the city is <br />conditions must be met: <br />immune from liability. <br />1.The city must have been negligent. That is, the city <br />must have done something it shouldn’t have done, or failed to do something it should have <br />done. <br />2.The damages must have been causedby the city’s negligence. <br /> <br />