Laserfiche WebLink
Respondent Proposal <br />Project Understanding and Approach <br />The SEH project <br />Roseville has proposed a two-pronged incremental approach to updating <br />approach will achieve <br />the comprehensive stormwater management plan: <br />full support for <br />implementation <br />Reduce the hydraulic overloading of the existing stormwater <br />infrastructure <br />Mitigate waterbody impairment <br />The City’s strategy includes: <br />Introducing small scale BMPs into future street restoration programs <br />Developing engineering standards for volume control, rate control, <br />pollutant mitigation requirements for development and <br />redevelopment <br /> The key to <br />Project Approach Provides the City with “Best Value.” <br />Major Task No. 1: <br />keeping a planning project on time and within budget is to seek agency <br />Coordination with City <br />input and involvement from the outset. Our experience in local <br />Staff and Reviewing <br />comprehensive surface water management plans has been that there <br />Agencies <br />frequently a difference between the written requirements of the review <br />agencies and the “actual” requirements communicated during forma <br />plan review. Our approach to involving the agencies is to gain u <br />Assumptions and <br />clarity and commitment to the requirements that will be used to <br />Responsibilities: <br /> <br />the City’s plan. Next, we’ll work with City staff to establish a process to <br />SEH will participate, set-up, facilitate <br />and document all meetings. City staff <br />establish goals and policies and indentify problem areas, priori <br />will participate in all meetings, and <br />impairments. This effort will also include finalizing the strate <br />will amend the scope, schedule and <br />budget as applicable. <br />involvement and participation. Public involvement throughout the <br />planning process will build community support for plan implement <br />Deliverables: <br />At the onset of the project, SEH will work with you to fine-tune the details <br />Agency MOA regarding requirements <br />of the public involvement approach – audiences, messages, venues, tools, <br />for plan approval. Final scope, <br />schedule, and budget. <br />and schedule. We share in your recognition of the importance of <br /> <br />community involvement and will bring this structured approach to <br />project. <br />Ultimately, Best Value is <br />Ultimately, “Best Value” is delivered through City-controlled scope and <br />delivered through City <br />schedule. After completion of these important first steps, the s <br />controlled scope and <br />schedule and budget will be revisited to consider any necessary <br />schedule <br />amendments based on agency, staff and public input. One issue wi <br />meeting the schedule in the Request for Proposal (RFP) relates to the <br />dissolution of the Grass Lake WMO. Roseville may be unable to ob <br />approval for the Grass Lake area until the watershed organizatio <br />combined with an adjacent watershed organization – which could take up <br />to 12 months or more. <br /> <br />The modeling assessment and development strategy systematically <br /> SEH will be able to hit the ground <br />resolves priority problem areas. <br />running based on our recent planning experience, knowledge gaine <br />the development of the 1990 CSWMP, along with our previous work for <br />the Grass Lake WMO, including field survey data and model calibr <br />efforts. Our efforts will focus heavily on the extensive body of <br />has occurred since the 2003 CSWMP was completed, including repor <br />| page 2 <br />respondent proposal <br /> <br />