2012_0312_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

A realistic strategy for implementation results in attainment of Major Task No. 4: Goals and policies established in CSWMPs are typically developed goals. in accordance alignment with Minnesota Rules 8410 and the specific Goal Setting. Policies, requirements of the Metropolitan Council and the three watershed Implementation Plan organizations. Before adopting the often generic and non-community and Priorities specific goals and policies that will ultimately yield an implementation plan, we will work staff, agencies and citizens to establish an Assumptions and Responsibilities: guiding mission statement for the plan. With a mission statement in place, the identified plan objectives will be established in a cause-and- SEH will prepare drafts. City will provide prompt reviews. effect manner that supports the overall mission. Each of the major plan objectives will have leading and lagging performance measures th Deliverables: be used to report plan implementation and results. Mission statement, goals and policies, implementation plan, The most cost-effective approach for plan implementation is to integrate engineering standards and BMPs with future street program improvements and re-development. developer guidelines We and other also recommend integration with Parks Master Plan implementation public/private partnerships. One of the critical deliverables will be engineering standards and developer guidelines that will ensure Major Task No. 5: consistency in BMP implementation and stream line City staff Development of Draft involvement while improving customer service. and Final Plan CSWMPs often consist Plan deliverables will increase staff efficiencies. of a land and water resource inventory, specific goals and polic Assumptions and description of problem areas and an implementation program. Most Responsibilities: plans are delivered today as an electronic document that is posted on the City will prompt feedback citys web site. This type of plan may be traditional but not likely on format responsive to the post-planning needs of City staff or the public. We propose to develop a map-based, customized plan format that can receive Deliverables: agency approval, serve as a quick reference to city staff, provisistent Format for map-based final plan, agency review documents and clear direction relative to development standards, clarify t and responsibilities of multiple water resource management entit deliver transparency for the general public. As the City continu Major Task No. 6: explore options for asset management, we will evaluate options f Follow-through on GIS as a base for the plan and how the plan can most effectively Approvals with future asset management methods. Short Technology improves long-term regulatory responsiveness. Assumptions and term responsiveness involves developing a plan that delivers the Responsibilities: goals of the community while meeting the regulatory requirements City will schedule with all commissions and Council. SEH Metropolitan Council and the three watersheds that overlay the City. will make presentations. There are no special tools or approaches for the short term aspe approval. We will assemble all comments, develop a response to Deliverables: comments document, amend the plan as necessary to receive approv Response to comments and then produce the final planning document. Longer-term document, final map-based responsiveness relates to plan implementation as well as the Cit plan, first year subscription to PermiTrack MS4 and training Storm water permitting reporting in accordance with MPCA and the http://mynpdespermit.com/ EPA. In the long-term, SEH proposes that the City use SEH online tools docs/ms4/SFHC016a.pdf including PermiTrack MS4 to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of annual MS4 reporting, and PermiTrack ESC project tracking with partner accessibility and community transparency (http://mynpdespermit.com/). | page 4 respondent proposal