Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br />OF CITY COUNCIL <br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall at 2660 Civic Center <br />Drive, Roseville, Minnesota, on Monday, the 5th day of December, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Kough, Maschka, Ihlan, Schroeder and Klausing and <br />the following members were absent: none. <br /> <br />Member Maschka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 10356 <br />RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT ON <br />ROSELA WN AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT <br />AND ORDERING PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Council ofthe City of Roseville as follows: <br /> <br />1. By resolution adopted September 26, 2005, the Council directed the City Engineer to <br />prepare preliminary reports as to the feasibility of the proposed improvements: <br /> <br />P-06-02: <br /> <br />Roselawn Avenue Reconstruction <br />(between Snelling and Hamline Avenue) <br /> <br />2. The City Engineer was also directed to include in the report the estimated cost of the <br />proposed improvements. The preliminary report and cost estimates have been submitted <br />and considered by the Council and are hereby approved and directed to be placed on file <br />in the office ofthe City Manager. The improvements proposed to be made in the general <br />manner set forth in the report are designated as City Improvements P-06-02, Roselawn <br />Avenue Reconstruction. <br /> <br />3. The Council shall meet at the City Hall, 2660 Civic Center Drive, in said City, on <br />January 9, 2006, at 6:00 p.m. for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed <br />improvements under and pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, <br />and the Manager is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place, and <br />purpose of that meeting to be published twice in the official newspaper, Roseville <br />Review, which publications shall be a week apart, and the second publication shall be not <br />less than three days before the date of the hearing. <br /> <br />4. The notice shall be in substantially the following form: (see attachments). <br /> <br />5. The general nature, estimated cost and area proposed to be assessed for Improvements P- <br />06-02, Roselawn Avenue Reconstruction are determined to be as stated in the foregoing <br />notice, as fully as though the same were separately set forth and resolved herein <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Schroeder and <br />upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Kough, Maschka, Ihlan, <br />Schroeder and Klausing and the following voted against the same: none. <br /> <br />Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />