res_10358 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ROSEVILLE RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota was duly held at the City Hall in said City on Monday, the 5th day of December, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. The following members were present: Kough, Mascl1ka, Ihlan, Schroeder and Klausing and the following were absent: Councilmember Maschka introduced and moved the adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 10358 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT THE CAPITOL REGION WATERSHED DISTRICT DELAY IMPLEMENTATION OF THEIR NEW RULES AND ESTABLISH A TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE WHEREAS, the Capitol Region Watershed District (hereinafter, the "CRWD") was established on September 24, 1998. Approximately one-third of the geographic area ofthe City of Roseville is within the CRWD. The CRWD also includes portions of the cities ofSt. Paul, Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, and Maplewood; and WHEREAS, the CRWD adopted a Watershed Management Plan on December 14, 2000. On October 10, 2005, the City of Roseville was informed by the CRWD that it had completed a draft of rules and technical standards that are intended to implement the goals and policies of the CRWD's Watershed Management Plan and that the draft of these rules and standards was ready for review within a 45-day time period that was set to end on November 29, 2005, at 4:30 p.m.; and WHEREAS, the draft rules and standards proposed by CRWD on October 10,2005, have been reviewed by staff from the departments of Public Works and Community Development. Staff reports that they have identified a number of questions about the potential for unintended consequences to City operations at a variety oflevels if the draft rules and technical standards are adopted as proposed by the CRWD. Staff is of the opinion that the draft rules and standards have the potential to impact, among a number ofthings, neighborhood street improvement projects, residential housing improvement plans, private development potential and maintenance and improvements of park and recreation services. Some of the questions identified by staff include the following: