My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0419
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0419
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:29:02 AM
Creation date
12/15/2005 11:26:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/10/2004
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 04/19/04 <br />Minutes - Page 23 <br /> <br />hired due to the salary cap, it seemed unfair to ask the City <br />Manager to accept a reduced compensation package due to a <br />miscalculation on the part of the City. <br /> <br />City AttoTI1ey Squires and Finance Director Miller reviewed <br />several alternatives that would maintain the compensation <br />package on the same level from a net standpoint, while meeting <br />state requirements. Those alternatives were: 1) Optional life <br />insurance outside of that provided by the City; or 2) <br />consideration of the City Manager being considered a "group of <br />one" for the Post Employment Health Care Spending Account. <br />Mr. Miller noted that this alternative was still being researched <br />with several vendors. <br /> <br />City Attorney Squires advised that whichever option the City <br />Council chose, he would seek an opinion from DOER to <br />determine if the proposed new characterization would comply <br />with statute. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing sought Council discussion and/or comment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough strongly supported a reasonable car <br />allowance as a solution. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan, from a contract standpoint, supported <br />maintaining the original contract amount, as negotiated in good <br />faith; noting the minimal $621 differential could be adjusted <br />without drastic amendments to the original contract. <br /> <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 N Victoria Street <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn opined that it was unethical for the City Council <br />to hold a discussion related to sidestepping a state-mandated <br />salary cap. Mr. Kysylyczyn stated the longevity of the State <br />Statute and concurred with Councilmember Kough's suggestion <br />regarding the City Manager's auto allowance. Mr. Kysylyczyn <br />further opined that the City Council should consider action <br />against the former City Attorney's firm for their interpretation of <br />the Statute; or that the City could seek a waiver request. Mr. <br />Kysylyczyn submitted a formal public information request via <br />City AttoTI1ey Squires for a list of memberships paid by the City <br />on behalf of the City Manager, the most recent salary of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.