Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Study Session - 05/17104 <br />Minutes - Page 18 <br /> <br />implementation of such a franchise fee. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka supported continuing staff s annual <br />review of the City's fee structure; Mayor Klausing concurred, <br />further encouraging staff to provide any additional ideas to the <br />Council that they deemed appropriate. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing noted that the only "untouchables" from his <br />perspective would be any reductions that would endanger public <br />heal tho <br /> <br />City Manager Beets once again sought Council direction on the <br />time1ine as identified in the staff report, as modified during <br />tonight's discussion; with Councilmembers concurring with the <br />schedule. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder questioned whether the time1ine <br />should include an additional meeting to discuss the "substance," <br />issues and for the Council to provide additional input. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets advised that staff would proceed to prepare a <br />similar level of detail this year as presented last year, including <br />aggregate data and appendices (with page numbers) to review <br />the line item detail. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets further noted that, for residents who had <br />expressed concern or interest in specific departments, staff would <br />notify them when that department was to come before the <br />Council and the community to provide for intangible quality <br />comments. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets took the Council's direction tonight as it <br />related to "substance," to project an approximate $700,000 levy <br />increase to cover the structural gap and inflationary increases; <br />see how that looks, while at the same time evaluating other <br />programs as well to determine which were achieving their <br />objectives and public support, and for staff to provide <br />recommendations for potential cuts and/or restructuring. <br />Councilmember concurred. <br />Mayor Klausing challenged that staff target approximately half <br />of the projected shortfall through potential cuts. <br />