Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Regular Meeting -12/05/05 <br />Minutes - Page 24 <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Schroeder seconded, adoption of Resolution <br />No. l0358 entitled, "Resolution Requesting that the Capitol <br />Region Watershed District Delay Implementation of Their New <br />Rules and Establish a Technical Advisory Committee." <br /> <br />Discussion included other jurisdictions and their support of <br />similar resolutions; potential impacts for timing of construction <br />projects for approval processes; and plan review considerations. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Kough; Maschka; Ihlan; Schroeder and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />Consider the 2006 Budget <br />Mayor Klausing continued previous meeting discussions, and <br />again sought consensus for a proposed final levy amount; and <br />sought support for the City Manager's "Option D" as previously <br />presented for a 5% levy increase for 2006. Mayor Klausing <br />reiterated his concerns with this level of an increase and the <br />pattern and practice of using and further reducing reserves. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka concurred with Mayor Klausing's <br />comments; and opined his support of a 5% levy increase for <br />2006. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder had provided Councilmembers with <br />another proposal for line item reductions for Council <br />consideration. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder reviewed his proposal and expressed <br />concern with delaying equipment purchases or replacements, <br />based on proven overhead costs and maintenance records used to <br />offset additional maintenance. Councilmember Schroeder was <br />unable to offer an opinion related to dipping into reserves <br />without expert opinion on the matter; and was not supportive of <br />the City Manager's Option D as presented, without further <br />reV1SJOn. <br /> <br />Schroeder moved to have the City Council hire an outside <br />consultant knowledgeable to review the City's reserve amounts <br />and suggested minimum levels to retain, similar to that recently <br /> <br />Consider the 2006 <br />Budget <br />