Laserfiche WebLink
<br />shifting the focus from individual parcels to the entire Twin Lakes area, the City applied <br />for and received a number of grants from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency <br />("EPA") for assessment and cleanup in Twin Lakes, including: <br /> <br />. In 1999, a $200,000 Brownfields Assessment Pilot Program grant funded Phase <br />I and Phase II environmental assessments of the proposed Twin Lakes Parkway <br />property and a cleanup plan for the property, <br /> <br />. In 2000, a $500,000 Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund Pilot Program <br />grant was intended to incentivize property owners and developers to assess and <br />clean up contamination, provide a funding source for cleanup, and provide a <br />mechanism to leverage additional loans from private banks and access grants <br />from other government sources, including the Department of Trade and <br />Economic Development, the Petrofund and the Metropolitan Council <br />Demonstration Fund, and <br /> <br />. In 2001, $150,000 in Brownfields Supplemental Assistance funded a <br />groundwater study. <br /> <br />Also in 2001, Roseville adopted an amended Master Plan concept for Twin Lakes, <br />called the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area Renewal Strategy, which provided for the <br />redevelopment of 46 parcels on approximately 170 acres. This acreage, combined with <br />the properties and brownfields redeveloped to date plus green space, parks and rights- <br />of-way, add up to the total 275 acres of Twin Lakes. <br /> <br />Also in 2001, the City prepared and adopted an Alternative Urban Areawide Review <br />(AUAR) for all 170 acres proposed for redevelopment. The AUAR addressed the <br />impact of various redevelopment scenarios for "Opportunity Areas" 1-12 within Twin <br />Lakes. The AUAR also considered the impact of the construction of Twin Lakes <br />Parkway from Cleveland to Fairview Avenues, which is essential for access if the area <br />is to be redeveloped. Although the City may revise the proportions of land uses from <br />that set forth in the AUAR to reflect a decline in the market for medical and office space <br />since 2001 and an increase in demand for housing, additional environmental review will <br />likely not be required if the overall intensity of the new land use mix does not exceed <br />that originally contemplated. <br /> <br />TIF Oistrict 17 FInd Hazardolls Substance SlIhdistrir.t 17 A <br /> <br />The buildings in the TIF District were constructed between 1950 and 1980. While most <br />of them are considered "old", they are not considered to have any historical value or <br />architectural merit. As properties age, they require higher levels of maintenance and <br />repair. Over 75% of the buildings in the TIF District can be considered to be lacking in <br />needed maintenance and repair. <br />