My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_1219
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_1219
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:29:43 AM
Creation date
1/17/2006 3:36:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/19/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 12/19/05 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 21 <br /> <br />real estate owners who had a clear understanding of the system, <br />and additional negotiating powers available during the eminent <br />domain process. <br /> <br />Mr. Krass, as the City's legal representative in this matter, <br />provided assurances that the redeveloper had made reasonable <br />efforts, as defined in the Contract for Private Redevelopment the <br />City and the redeveloper to acquire the four parcels; and it was <br />now time for the City Council to consider a resolution <br />authorizing the acquisition of those four parcels by use of <br />eminent domain. Mr. Krass noted historical evidence that once a <br />resolution authorizing the use of eminent domain was passed, <br />many property owners became serious in their negotiations. Mr. <br />Krass further noted, from their experience, that it was quite <br />common in a project of the Twin Lakes magnitude and with <br />sophisticated property owners to have some of those owners wait <br />as long as possible to resolve financial issues. <br /> <br />Mr. Krass advised that his firm was recommending Council <br />adoption of the resolution authorizing eminent domain for the <br />identified parcels; noting that the timing at the end of the year <br />was fitting as the same Council that had worked through the <br />development process to-date should make this decision as well. <br /> <br />Discussion included the eminent domain process itself and <br />potential filing of a petition for condemnation, court date and the <br />make up of the commissioners. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned why another public hearing <br />had not been scheduled for public comment prior to the City <br />Council being asked to pursue eminent domain. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing assured Councilmember Ihlan that public <br />comment had been heard, substantial media coverage had been <br />provided, and that the public would continue to be heard, but that <br />the City Council needed to make a decision at this point. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan reiterated her, concern that there was not <br />an additional opportunity for a public hearing given that eminent <br />domain was such a controversial decision. Councilmember Ihlan <br />opined that this was probably the most awesome power the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.