Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on April 6, 2005, held a hearing on the Beauclaire <br />variance and subdivision requests. One neighbor was present to support the subdivision but to <br />caution about the private sewer and pumping systems. He recommended a new city sewer line as <br />an alternative. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the variances and <br />subdivision 6-0 based on the findings in Section 5 of the project report and subject to the <br />conditions within Section 6 of the project report dated April 6, 2005, and including payment of <br />park fee by applicant (if required after attorney review) and, if requested on the new parcel, side <br />yard variances will be required rather than setback permits. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, based on findings as outlined in Section 5 of the project report dated April <br />25,2005, the Community Development Staff recommends approval of the variance requests, and <br />subject to the conditions outlined in Section 6 of the project report dated April 25, 2005; <br /> <br />a. The City policy is to require payment of the Metro Area Sewer Availability <br />Charge (SAC) upon the issuance of a building permit. In this case, a $1,350 SAC <br />fee is required and will be collected with the issuance of a building permit for <br />Parcel "A". <br /> <br />b. The applicant must record the two lot minor subdivision survey within 60 days <br />after the approval of the City Council. Public utility and drainage easements of 5 <br />feet are required on the sides and rear lot line, while a 10 feet right of way <br />easement is required on the east Dale Street frontage. In addition, a private utility <br />easement across parcel B in favor of Parcel A for private sanitary sewer placement <br />must be recorded with the survey. <br /> <br />c. The applicant must apply for and receive a driveway access permit for Ramsey <br />County prior to issuance of any building or grading permit. <br /> <br />d. A grading plan and the survey ("B" above) must be submitted with the building <br />permit application. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Schroeder and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Ihlan, <br />Maschka, Schroeder, Kough, Klausing <br /> <br />and the following voted against: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />2 <br />