My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0123
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:29:52 AM
Creation date
1/31/2006 1:21:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/23/2006
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 01/23/06 <br />Minutes - Page 19 <br /> <br />affected property; and the greatest number of owners of property <br />situation wholly or partially within the following: <br />a) 350' of the outside boundaries of the property in question; <br />or <br />b) two complete adjacent properties, as measured <br />perpendicular to the boundaries of the property in question <br />(including properties that lie across streets or public rights- <br />of-way that are adjacent to the property in question); or <br />c) A distance outside the boundaries of the property in <br />question that equals the greatest total width dimension of <br />the property in question." <br />Mr. Roe opined that this was a way to achieve objectives of staff <br />and Council, as a best effort attempt to accomplish maximum <br />notification for a pending project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka questioned whether there was actually a <br />problem that existed; and noted the additional notification for <br />comprehensive and complex projects (i.e., Twin Lakes). <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough spoke in support of Mr. Roe's suggested <br />policy. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing requested staff s criteria for deviating from <br />standard practice and increasing the notification area. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsch advised that there was no written criteria used by staff, <br />but depending on the neighborhood and physical boundaries, <br />discretion was used in whether the notice area should be expanded. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsch concurred with Mr. Roe's proposed notice policy; by <br />using the greatest dilnension of the staff; and opined it would be <br />an easy solution for staff to follow. <br /> <br />After further discussion, it was the Council consensus to direct <br />staff to utilize the notice outlined by Mr. Roe, in addition to State <br />Statute 462.357, Subd. 3. <br /> <br />6. Continue Discussing the International Property Maintenance <br />Code (IPMC) as Part of the Roseville City Code (continued <br />from 12/19/05 meeting) (PF 3708) <br />Community Development Director Welsch addressed <br /> <br />International <br />Property <br />Maintenance Code <br />(IPMC) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.