My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0621
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0621
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:30:19 AM
Creation date
2/9/2006 2:19:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Legal Publications
Meeting Date
6/21/2004
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Fwd: Impact on residential taxpayers of an increase in th... <br /> <br />(feasible). Please remember, the financial plan they have previously <br />proposed wants 46 million in subsidy. The plan they presented does NOT <br />show how much they expect they can cover in tax increment proceeds. It <br />only shows what they want to borrow initially. Based on the current TIF II, <br />which is all we legally have in place, we only have 10 more years of tif <br />collections available, and that district is currently bringing in less that a 1/2 <br />million a year. You need to know how much do they forecast tif collections <br />under the existing tif # II (Twin Lakes) to be. I estimate 10 years <br />X$500,000, or 5 million. That, out of 46 million is not a feasible plan. Nor <br />was their initial plan of showing 19 million of TIFborrowings withoug <br />indicating how much they forecast future TIFcollections will be. <br />Remember, when you borrow, you not only repay the principal borrowed, <br />but also the interest for carrying the loan. (Roughly, double the principal). <br /> <br />Please keep in mind your priorities: Do not spend all summer on the <br />Twin Lakes project. Work hard on our upcoming budget. Maintain our <br />present services and be as gentle as you can on your constituents. Bite <br />the bullet, increase our taxes as necessary to maintain current levels of <br />service, but stop anything that adds to that bill. Including Twin Lakes. <br /> <br />.Jl{ Sands <br /> <br />Subject: RE: Impact on residential taxpayers of an increase in the levy <br />From: chris. miller@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />Date: Man, 21 Jun 2004 08:14:56 -0500 <br />To: ESANDS2612@aol.com, chris.miller@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />CC: neal.beets@ci.roseville.mn.us <br /> <br />AI, <br /> <br />Holding all other factors constant, a $1 million increase in the tax levy would <br />increase property taxes for homeowners by 11 %. This holds true for all <br />residential properties with a taxable value of $500,000 or less. For those homes <br />that are above $500,000, the impact is slightly higher. <br /> <br />2of4 <br /> <br />6/21/2004 11 :25 AM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.