Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br />· There is no vision of how unique the housing will be other than it will be "different" <br />· It's unclear how the mix of retail, housing and office comes together with any synergy. <br />· It's unclear why this plan will augment Roseville's identity. <br /> <br />I can understand the notion that it's premature in the process to be specific of what <br />will be built at Twin Lakes. That's fine and understandable, but the problem in this <br />case - Roseville residents may have to pay taxes to finance it. <br /> <br />*~*~*~*~*~*~**~*~*~*~*~*~* <br /> <br />Concluding note - I don't see a compelling redevelopment plan benefiting the short and long term interests of <br />Roseville citizens over expected taxes to pay for it. Though the Twin Lakes mantra was "The Worst Thing to Do is <br />Nothing''. to me, the worst thing to do is for residents to pay a lot of taxes for no common good benefit. But I'm <br />open to further plans and discussions, especially around the financing aspect and pointed discussion on how <br />Roseville benefits in the short and long term. <br /> <br />Regards, <br /> <br />Richard "Jake" Jacobson <br />