Laserfiche WebLink
ExecutiveSummary:StudyoftheMetropolitanAreaFiscalDisparitiesProgram <br />FortheMinnesotaDepartmentofRevenue <br />FISCAL DISPARITIES PROGRAM TRENDS <br />Jurisdictionsthatcontributemoreintaxbasethantheyreceiveareknownas{“;·-š“·©z,Ò·š©­|and <br />thosethatcontributelesstaxbasethantheyreceiveareknownas{“;·©;-z¦z;“·­u|Figure13provides <br />furtherdetailonthetypesofcommunitiesthatarenetcontributorsornetrecipientscomparingthe <br />7 <br />startoftheprogram,1976to2011.Thecomparisonrevealsthefollowing: <br />CentralCities(forwhichtherearetwo)havetypicallybeeneitherallrecipientsorsplitwith <br />MinneapolisasanetcontributorandSt.Paulasanetrecipient. <br />DevelopedAreasin2011arealmostevenlysplitbetweenrecipientsandcontributorswith <br />recipientsoutnumberingcontributorsonlyslightly,whichisachangefrom1976where <br />recipientsoutnumberedcontributorsbyafactorof1.7. <br />ThenumberofDevelopingAreacommunitiesineithercategoryhasremainedrelatively <br />constantwhencomparing1976to2011withnetrecipientsoutnumberingcontributorsinboth <br />years. <br />ForRuralAreas,therelationshipofrecipientstocontributorshaschangedfrom1976,wherethe <br />ratioofrecipientstocontributorswas5.5.In2011,theratiohasdecreasedto3.5. <br />AllRuralGrowthCentersarenetrecipientsin2011,astheywerein1976aswell. <br />7 <br />Theregionaldevelopmentclassificationsweredesignatedin2004andthereforewerenotinexistencein1976. <br />However,asisdoneelsewhereinthisstudy,wegroupthemunicipalitiesintheseclassificationsforcomparison <br />purposes. <br />14 <br /> <br />