Laserfiche WebLink
ExecutiveSummary:StudyoftheMetropolitanAreaFiscalDisparitiesProgram <br />FortheMinnesotaDepartmentofRevenue <br />Foreachjurisdiction,TischlerBiseevaluatedninelanduse-·;mš©z;­“EzÝ;residentialandfour <br />nonresidentiallanduses.Thelandusecategoriesarelistedbelow.Demographicfactorsvaryby <br />jurisdictionandarediscussedineach†Ò©z­7z-·zš“x­sectionofthisreport.Theseprototypesarethen <br />usedtoanalyzefiscalimpactstothe(a)municipality,(b)county,and(c)primaryschooldistrict. <br />ResidentialLandUse <br />Singlefamilydetachedunit:Highervalue <br />Singlefamilydetachedunit:Medianvalue <br />Singlefamilydetachedunit:Lowervalue <br />Multifamily/Condo(Homestead)unit <br />Apartmentunit <br />NonresidentialLandUse <br />Commercial/Retail <br />Office <br />Industrial <br />Institutional(taxexempt) <br />ThisstudydoesnotintendtobecomprehensiveorexhaustiveidentifyingoverburdensinMetroarea <br />municipalitiesorfiscalimpactsiftheFiscalDisparitiesprogramwereeliminated.Thiswouldbe <br />11 <br />impossibleevenwithunlimitedtimeandfunding.Rather,itisintendedtoidentifythefiscal <br />relationshipbetweenlandusesandservicedemands/costsatthemainlevelsofgovernmentproviding <br />servicesandinfrastructureunderthecurrentFiscalDisparitiesprogramandpotentialfiscalimpactsif <br />theprogramwereeliminated. <br />CostofLandUseFiscalAnalysis:GeneralApproach <br />Foreachcaseexample,costandrevenuefactorshavebeendeterminedbasedonFY2011budgetsand <br />additionalfiscalresearch.Theanalysisisbasedon currentlevelsofservice.Currentlevelsofservice <br />representtherespectivelevelofmšÝ;©“’;“·x­(City,County,orSchoolDistrict)currentlevelofspending <br />forservicesandfacilities.Thatis,assumptionsmadeintheanalysisarebasedonrevenuesources, <br />programs,services,requirements,andpoliciesthatareinplacetoday(withtheexceptionofthe <br />{Þz·wšÒ·FiscalDisparitiest©šm©’|scenariowheretaxratesareadjustedtoreflecthypothetical <br />eliminationoftheprogram). <br />TheanalysisincludesGeneralFundsandmajorSpecia <br />lFunds,bothoperatingandcapital,foreachlevel <br />ofgovernmentevaluated.Enterprisefundsarenotincludedintheanalysisastheyareassumedtobe <br />11 <br />However,onalocationspecificlevel,thiscouldbedoneasisbeingdoneintheCityofAnoka(seetheGISRDC <br />study)aswellaswasconductedbyTischlerBisein200001. <br />26 <br /> <br />