My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_0319_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_0319_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2012 3:25:52 PM
Creation date
3/15/2012 3:42:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ExecutiveSummary:StudyoftheMetropolitanAreaFiscalDisparitiesProgram <br />FortheMinnesotaDepartmentofRevenue <br />12 <br />inequityanddiscouragesassessorsfromraisingassessmentlevelsintheirÒ©z7z-·zu| <br />However,anumberofadministrativechallengestoaddresssthisissuehavebeenidentified. <br />Eliminatingtheexemptions.PropertyattheMinneapolisSt.PaulAirportisexemptfromfiscal <br />disparitiescontributions.WhiletheAirportmayseemalikelycandidateforinclusioninthe <br />program,eliminatingtheexemptionwouldbeproblematicsinceitwouldcontributetothepool <br />13 <br />butwouldnotreceiveanydistributionunderthecurrentpopulationbasedformula. <br />Eliminatingthe1971basevaluesubtraction.Theargumenthereisthatthe1971startingpoint <br />{7z-©zz·;againstthoseareasthathaveexperiencedmostoftheirdevelopmentsince <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />Relatedtothisistheconceptthattheareawidepoolreflects40percentoftotalC/I <br />valuationfrom1971includingincreasesduetogrowthandinflation.Ithasbeenarguedthat <br />onlynetnewgrowthshouldbeincludedbasedonthelogicthatdevelopmentisabletooccur <br />becauseofregionalinvestment(e.)andthereforetheformulawouldbemore <br />g.,roads,sewers <br />reflectiveofthe¦©m©xgoals.Thecounterargumenttothisisthatthelawallowsfora <br />regionalbalanceamongpropertiesthatincreaseinvalueandthosethatdecline. <br />Includingaspendingneedcomponenttotheformula,ratherthanpurelytaxbasedriven.As <br />discussedinthisreport,thisaspectoftheProgramiswidelydiscussed.Theargumentbeingthat <br />spendingneedsofjurisdictionsvaryandtaxbaseisnotnecessarilyagoodpredictorofthose <br />needs.HinzeandBakernotetheinherentchallengestoalteringtheformulatoaccountfor <br />dtechnical. <br />thisarebothpoliticalan <br />StabilityoftheProgram.Ithasbeennotedonseveraloccasionsthattheprogramisseenas <br />stableandnotsubjecttoapoliticalprocess.Thisisseenasbothanadvantageanda <br />disadvantage.Anadvantageinthatitoccursasamatterofcourseandallowsforrelative <br />stabilityinlocalfundingavailability.Ontheotherhand,itslegacyasaprogramfromthe1970s <br />thathasnotbeenmodifiedandisnotpartofanypoliticalprocessleadstosomecriticism. <br />Longtermimpact.Anotherpointmadebystakeholdersconsultedforthisstudyistherapidly <br />developingareas{äÒm;©-Òz·z;|maybeexperiencinganincreasein <br />commercial/industrialgrowthrelativetopopulationgrowthandthereforemaybeanet <br />contributor.Asthesecommunitiesmatureandbegintobuildout,theymayremainnet <br />contributorsbutatasmallermarginormayseedeclineinvaluecausingatransitiontonet <br />recipientstatus.Thischan <br />gedstatusallowsforadditionalresourcestomakeuptheshortfall <br />andpotentiallysupportredevelopmentefforts,whichovertimemaytransitionthecommunity <br />backtonetcontributorstatus. <br />12 <br />HinzeandBaker,2005,p.,31. <br />13 <br />Id.,p.32 <br />14 <br />Id.,p.,32. <br />37 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.