My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0719
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0719
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:30:37 AM
Creation date
2/13/2006 12:22:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/19/2004
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 07/19/04 <br />Minutes - Page 19 <br /> <br />those properties to produce an end result. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing noted the public policy question of whether the <br />current use is inconsistent with the greater public good; whether <br />the City wanted to eliminate truck terminals to accommodate <br />different uses; and whether the policy being pursued is worth <br />purSUIng. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding orderly acquisition process <br />as part of a development plan; use of Eminent Domain to secure <br />key parcels for the proposed redevelopment; and the Council's <br />condensation of the process into a series of decisions all at once, <br />rather than in a more orderly process. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that developers should be able to <br />pay market value for land without the use of public monies. <br /> <br />Mr. Noonan advised that the developer was paying the prevailing <br />cost for acquiring truck terminals; and that, in a perfect world, <br />the seller would be responsible for clean up costs. However, Mr. <br />Noonan noted that, in past attempts to negotiate deductions or <br />contingencies for the seller to pay a portion of clean up costs, <br />negotiations were not successful. Mr. Noonan further noted that <br />approximately 2/3 of the properties had been purchased or are in <br />control of the developer, with several key pieces along Cleveland <br />Avenue still pending. <br /> <br />Mr. Casserly noted that attempts at legislation several years ago <br />related to responsible parties and clean up of contaminated <br />parcels had proven unsuccessful. <br /> <br />Mr. Casserly introduced Greg Johnson, who performed the <br />financial analyses provided for tonight's discussion. Mr. <br />Casserly provided, as a bench handout, a more detailed analysis <br />than the summaries provided in the Council packets. <br /> <br />Mr. Casserly and Mr. Johnson reviewed the financial analysis <br />and assumptions in great detail, including proposed square <br />footages of business, retail and housing units; cash flow and <br />present value analysis using various assumptions; projected <br />market values of taxes payable in 2005 and current market value; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.