My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0809
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0809
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2007 2:18:13 PM
Creation date
2/13/2006 1:21:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/9/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting - 08/09/04 <br />Minutes -Page 16 <br />Mayor Klausing concurred with the majority of <br />Councilmember Maschka's comments and various <br />distinctions he made. Mayor Klausing further opined that <br />the area being redeveloped impacted the overall city, not <br />just a portion, and that needed to be taken into <br />consideration as to impact, benefits and the short and long- <br />term community health. <br />Mayor Klausing opined his concurrence with similar uses <br />linked to TIF pay-as-you go; not supportive of G.O. Bonds <br />or spreading fiscal disparities outside the District; no <br />support of subsidizing retail development, but given <br />economic realities and market forces, recognized the need <br />for the City to make some concessions to the Master <br />Developer to achieve the City's goals for additional <br />housing as concluded by the Twin Lakes Advisory <br />Stakeholder's Panel. Mayor Klausing concluded by <br />concurring with Councilmember Maschka's overall <br />strategy suggestions to shift the gap responsibilities within <br />the District. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined her opposition to the use of <br />any type of public monies as appropriate financing tools for <br />this private project without hearing the point of view of the <br />community and its taxpayers. Councilmember Ihlan <br />opined that that Council's focus should not be on whether <br />we can make the project proceed, but whether the project <br />costs served to benefit the corrllnunity. Councilmember <br />Ih1an cautioned review of the City's financial condition and <br />current discussions on cuts in staff and/or services to <br />correct the loss of state aid ramifications; and how the <br />City's entire budget reflected with the size of this one <br />project and requested financing. Councilmember Ihlan <br />concluded her comments by opining that the City should <br />not proceed until strategic planning for the future budget <br />was completed; and reiterated her preference for a public <br />hearing immediately. <br />Jim Casserly, the city's financial consultant, reviewed <br />public hearing requirements for TIF Districts and plans. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.