Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I Short Subjects <br /> <br /> <br />Updated: November 2005 <br /> <br />HOUSE RESEARCH <br /> <br />John Williams <br /> <br />The Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Transfer: <br />Current Law <br /> <br />After a nearly ten-year hiatus, the legislature in 2000 again began dedicating revenues from the motor <br />vehicle sales tax (MVST) to transportation-related purposes. A constitutional amendment proposed by the <br />legislature in 2005 would, if adopted, eventually result in 100 percent of MVST revenues going to <br />transportation. <br /> <br />What is MVST? <br /> <br />How MVST <br />revenue used to be <br />dedicated <br /> <br />How MVST <br />revenue is now <br />dedicated <br /> <br />- . <br /> <br />; r ; :.~;:"~: <br /> <br />The motor vehicle sales tax, or MVST, is the 6.5 percent sales tax applied to the <br />sale of new and used motor vehicles. <br /> <br />During the 1980s, the legislature dedicated MVST revenue to highways and transit, <br />intending that the money supplement other spending for those purposes. This <br />dedication was periodically changed or suspended, and it was abolished entirely' <br />beginning in fiscal year 1992. <br /> <br />Beginning in fiscal year 2000, the legislature restored the MVST transfer to <br />dedicated transportation funds, not to augment spending but provide tax relief. In <br />2000, the legislature put limits on license taxes for passenger cars. Since those <br />taxes go to the highway user tax distribution fund (HUTDF) and are dedicated <br />exclusively to highways, some means had to be found to make up the loss to <br />highway revenue. The legislature made up tl}e losses to dedicated highway funds <br />from reduction of automobile license taxes, and for losses to transit systems of <br />revenue formerly coming from pr9perty taxes. _'. <br /> <br />. . .. <br />.;" j.: :.~;"'.~: . <br /> <br />In the 2003 session, the legislature made another significant change in the j\1VST <br />distribution by Increasing the percentage to dedicated transit funds at the expense <br />of the share for dedicated highway funds. The transit funds' shares were intended <br />not just to replace property tax revenue but also to make up for budget cuts in <br />general fund appropriations for transit assistance. This allocation is intended to be <br />in effect through fiscal year 2007. <br /> <br />The distribution of MVST revenue is now as follows: <br /> <br />. 30 percent to HUTDF, the fund dedicated exclusively to state and local <br />highways. By constitutional dedication this money is further divided <br />a~ollg ~he state trunk highway fund, th~ county state-aid ~ig~yv~y fund, <br />and the municipal state-aid street fund. - . <br />· 0.65 percent directly to the county state-aid highway fund, in addition to its <br />share of the 30 percent above <br />· 0.17 percent directly to the municipal state-aid street fund, in addition to its <br />share of the 30 percent above <br />. 21.5 percent to the Metropolitan Council to replace revenue lost when the <br />