My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0909
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0909
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:31:23 AM
Creation date
2/15/2006 10:28:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/9/2004
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Special Study Session - 09/09/04 <br />Minutes - Page 2 <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing noted that, as per the City Manager's Budget <br />Memo, three solutions were provided: 1) increasing the General <br />Fund Levy; 2) identifying new revenue sources; and 3) cutting <br />expenses. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing again expressed his appreciation to the public <br />for their approval of the recent referendum for a 10% levy <br />increase to facilitate construction and remodeling on the City <br />Hall campus, noting that this was representative of a community <br />that works well and cooperatively. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing further noted that the School District and <br />Ramsey County were facing similar budget issues due to the <br />actions of the State of Minnesota. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka provided another context, noting that <br />the City Council had not approved a revenue increase since <br />2001, with the exception of the referendum. Noting inflationary <br />growth and substantial employee health insurance costs, <br />Councilmember Maschka opined that the City continued to fall <br />behind; and reiterated the need to address the structural issue as <br />soon as possible, then return to the historical policy of basing the <br />annual levy at inflationary levels to keep the City on track. <br />Councilmember Maschka, from a financial perspective, further <br />noted that government did not work in a non- inflationary <br />environment. <br /> <br />Counciln1ember Maschka provided written recommendations for <br />a 10% General Fund Levy increase for 2005, funding the City <br />Manager's recolnmended budget; and restoring funds as follows: <br /> <br />1. Forgo the implementation of a street light utility or gas <br />and electric franchise fee <br />2. Restoration of the Y2 year funding for the Police <br />Department Civilian position <br />3. Restoration of fundin for the Nature Center osition <br />4. Restoration of fundin for one Maintenance osition <br /> <br />Councihnember Maschka's recommendation did not include <br />funding for a custodial position or one Maintenance position, <br />or restore fundin for the Park 1m rovement Pro ram or the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.