My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0909
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0909
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:31:23 AM
Creation date
2/15/2006 10:28:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/9/2004
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Special Study Session - 09/09/04 <br />Minutes - Page 4 <br /> <br />inflation. Mr. Miller noted that the approximate $335,000 in <br />structural cuts applied last year were still there, but with inflation <br />of approximately $300,000, the City was faced with the same <br />$700,000 deficit. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller cited several examples, using those items identified <br />by Councilmember Schroeder (i.e., $50,000 in city-wide reduced <br />phone costs eroded by increased inflationary expenses from the <br />various phone vendors). Mr. Miller noted that the 2005 Budget, <br />as recon1mended, restored inflationary/structural costs back in. <br />Mr. Miller further noted that the cost-of-living adjustments to <br />salaries in itself represented an annual expense of approximately <br />$300,000. <br /> <br />Counciln1ember Maschka opined that the Council needed to take <br />the cost-of-living-adjustment (COLA) into effect, noting that <br />government is becoming more efficient; and further opining that <br />adoption of a zero-percent annual levy actually represented a cut <br />over the last three years due to inflation. Councilmember <br />Maschka noted that, during his 12 year tenure on the City <br />Council, the general guiding principal had been that as addressed <br />in the City Manager's budget recommendations, specifically <br />Item #2 in the Action Items, in property tax rates paralleling <br />inflationary costs. <br /> <br />Counciln1ember Schroeder sought specific clarification regarding <br />the $40,000 Fairview Community Center lease. <br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke responded to <br />Councihnelnber Schroeder's question regarding the Fairview <br />Community Center lease and savings of $40,000. Mr. Brokke <br />noted that those savings were absorbed by the City's <br />responsibility, as per joint contract with the School District, to <br />become responsible in 2005 for maintenance of several of the <br />area gynmasiums; and provision of supervisory personnel on the <br />City Hall calnpus on evenings and weekends to facilitate rental <br />use activities. Mr. Brokke further noted that the City was <br />continuing to lease two spaces at the Fairview Community <br />Center: one for storage and one for the dance studio due to the <br />availability of the stage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.