My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0913
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0913
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:31:31 AM
Creation date
2/15/2006 10:46:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/13/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 09/13/04 <br />Minutes - Page 14 <br /> <br />consideration of paying this specific claim. Mayor Klausing <br />noted that the policy may be more applicable for review by the <br />Public Works and Transportation Commission for <br />recommendation to the City Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough reiterated his request for the City to <br />share in payment of this property owner's claim. <br /> <br />Discussion continued regarding past practices, current policy and <br />this specific case. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder sought clarification as to language of <br />the City's policy regarding interpretation of the "Y." <br /> <br />Public Works Director Duane Schwartz responded that the "Y" <br />was considered as part of the service line; pursuant to the fact <br />that if there were no service to a parcel, there would not be a "Y" <br />connection. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding practices of cities based on their <br />philosophy of ownership of the "Y" connection; whether the <br />code was clear on that point; the city's inspection and <br />maintenance schedule; typical construction, installation practice <br />and specifications; age of service line and connection; as well as <br />similarity of the condition of this connection with other failures <br />over the years within the City, based on the aging infrastructure <br />and personal service line conditions. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Schwartz expressed concern that the City <br />Council be uniform in their interpretation of City Code to negate <br />requests for reimbursement from any and all property owners <br />having faced similar situations in needing to replace the <br />connection to their service lines, and having done so on their <br />own, with no City financial assistance. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing asked City Attorney Anderson for a legal <br />opinion as to the City's liability. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson responded that, in listening to the <br />situation and discussion, it would appear from a legal <br />perspective, that there would be no justification for the City to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.