Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville to take on. (For a discussion of what can happen when a city <br />uses development subsidies inappropriately, see this story about <br />Chanhassen: http://www.startribune.com/stories/535/64627 5.htnll). <br /> <br />If tax increment revenue bonds are issued in the amount requested, the <br />city's debt load would more than double. This has implications for the <br />city's bonding power for other public purposes - and if the project fails <br />and the TIF revenue bonds go into default, there will be a negative <br />impact on Roseville's bond and credit ratings. <br /> <br />Negative impacts on the quality of life in surrounding residential <br />neighborhoods (including increased traffic, increased air, noise and light <br />pollution, diminished green space and wildlife habitat and negative <br />impacts on Langton Lake and the park) will cause neighborhood <br />property values to stagnate or decline, further reducing property tax <br />revenue for Roseville, Ramsey County, and the Mounds View school <br />district. <br /> <br />Roseville is already saturated with retail development - we have the <br />most retail space per capita in the Twin Cities area, an amazing 82 <br />square feet per Roseville resident, which is more than 4 times the metro <br />area average of 18 square feet. (See Finance and Commerce, June 3, <br />2004: http://www.finance-commerce.com/recentarticles/040603d.htm) <br />If we subsidize more retail, we will only cause loss of tenants and <br />shoppers for our existing malls. As their vacancy rate increases, their <br />property values (and the property taxes they pay) will decline. And if we <br />subsidize giant retailers like Costco (which already have huge market <br />power and competitive advantage), the city will be using public money to <br />help drive our local small retailers out of business. This is extremely <br />unjust, and it will harm Roseville's local economy, causing more negative <br />consequences for our business community and tax base. <br /> <br />2. Unanswered Questions about the nature and extent of pollution on the site <br />make it extremely risky for the city to commit to payin2: the costs of <br />environmental clean-up" or for the project to 2:0 forward. <br /> <br />The most recent groundwater study (available on the City of Roseville <br />W ebsite) shows that groundwater in the Twin Lakes area is <br />contaminated with the solvent TCE, a substance hazardous to public <br />health. According to the study, further investigation and evaluation is <br />needed to determine the sources magnitude and extent of the <br />contamination, and whether it is continuing to move deeper into the area <br />groundwater. Further testing is also necessary to assess public health <br />risks, risks associated with disturbing TeE-contaminated areas during <br />construction, and strategies/costs for clean-up. The council heard a <br />