My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_1018
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_1018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:32:06 AM
Creation date
2/15/2006 1:07:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/18/2004
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />While the budget cuts remain in place for the 2005 Proposed Budget, they become largely <br />masked due to other factors - primarily inflation. Inflation increases the City's Budget by <br />approximately $300,000 annually just to sustain operations at their current levels. The 2005 <br />inflationary impacts effectively 'wipe out' the budget cuts enacted in 2004. Holding all other <br />factors constant, if the City desires to keep spending flat (absorb inflation) approximately <br />$300,000 in budget cuts would have to be enacted. . . each year! <br /> <br />To demonstrate the effect of inflation, consider the costs associated with one (1) Staff <br />Accountant position. Typically, the Staff Accountant is hired at the entry level - the level at <br />which someone with minimal experience in the profession is paid at. Under the City's current <br />pay structure, that individual might receive a starting annual salary of $35,000. However, one <br />year later, that employee is eligible to receive a salary increase reflective of their advancing <br />experience and skills, institutional knowledge, and overall performance. After one year, the <br />Staff Accountant's new salary might be $38,000, or a $3,000 increase. While this may not seem <br />like much, if you multiply this same effect by the City's 155 employees, as well as the supplies, <br />materials, vehicles, and other service inputs, the inflationary effect citywide is relatively large. <br /> <br />The inflationary effect described above demonstrates how difficult it is to achieve structural <br />budget balance without systematic revenue increases. <br /> <br />Identifying where the 2004 Budget Cuts fall <br />The following information tries to address the specific inquiries in at least a summarized form. <br />The original inquiry submitted by Councilmember Schroeder is shown in boldface followed by <br />Staff s response. <br /> <br />We reduced the Insurance premium by $100,000 by going to <br />self insured. <br />The amount reduced was $50,000 in the tax-supported funds, and is shown on <br />Page 35 of the Budget Book. While the full reduction is continued into 2005, <br />future budget years will require some increases. <br /> <br />We reduced the COLA to 2.3 % or $55,000. <br />The reduced COLA from 3% to 2.3% did 'save' the City approximately $50,000 <br />between the 2004 Proposed Budget and the 2004 Final Budget. These savings <br />don't transfer to future budget years. <br /> <br />We reduced Conf/training by $5,000. <br />The Conferences/training budgets were reduced in a number of departments. <br />Again, the reduction occurred between the 2004 Proposed Budget and the 2004 <br />Final Budget. These reduced amounts do not necessarily transfer to future budget <br />years. With regard to the 2005 Budget, Staff has requested what they feel is an <br />appropriate training budget based upon the training needs. The Council has at its <br />discretion the ability to cut this line-item budget, although some impact will be <br />felt. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.