My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_1108
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_1108
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:32:16 AM
Creation date
2/16/2006 11:06:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/8/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 11/08/04 <br />Minutes - Page 10 <br /> <br />that several years ago, MnDOT turned back to Ramsey <br />County the segment of Rice Street (Trunk Highway 49) <br />from 1-694 to University Avenue; and that as a result, the <br />County acquired the operation and maintenance <br />responsibilities for traffic control signals along that section <br />of Rice Street. With that turn back and subsequent <br />jurisdiction, new maintenance agreements needed to be <br />executed for several intersections: <br /> <br />A~reement # Intersection Parties to Ae;reement <br />PW 2003-21 at County Road C Ramsey County, Cities of Little <br /> Canada and Roseville <br />PW 2003-22 at County Road B-2 Ramsey County, Cities of Little <br /> Canada and Roseville <br />PW 2003-23 at Minnesota Street Ramsey County, Cities of Little <br /> Canada and Roseville <br />PW 2003-24 at County Road B Ramsey County, Cities of Little <br /> Canada, Roseville and Maplewood <br />PW 2003-26 at Roselawn A venue Ramsey County, Cities of Roseville <br /> and Maplewood <br />PW 2003-27 at Larpenteur Avenue Ramsey County, Cities of Roseville <br /> and Maplewood <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder questioned whether the City had <br />a choice on this matter, noting that the signals were for <br />signal lights at County to County intersections. <br /> <br />City Engineer Debra Bloom responded that the City <br />historically pays for the electricity for the lights; <br />consideration may be given not to participate, was not sure <br />of potential repercussions; but offered to perform further <br />research. <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Schroeder seconded, tabling action on <br />approval of signal maintenance agreements numbers W <br />2003-21; PW 2003-22; PW 2003-23; PW 2003-24; PW <br />2003-26; and PW 2003-27 between the City of Roseville <br />and Ramsey County; and directed staff to provide further <br />research and information to the City Council at their <br />earliest convenience for future consideration. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Kough, Maschka, Ihlan and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.