My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_1108
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_1108
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:32:16 AM
Creation date
2/16/2006 11:06:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/8/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 11/08/04 <br />Minutes - Page 33 <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Kough, Maschka, Ihlan and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />8.b <br /> <br />Consider Adopting a Resolution Amending the <br />Timeframes within the Contract Between the City of <br />Roseville and the Rottlund Companies in Light of the <br />EA W Petition <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Schroeder seconded, adoption of <br />Resolution No. 10259 entitled, "A Resolution Authorizing <br />Extension of Deadlines in the Contract for Exclusive <br />Negotiations between the City of Roseville, Minnesota <br />and the Rottlund Company, Inc., for the Twin Lakes <br />Redevelopment Area." <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned language in Section 3 of <br />the resolution entitled, "Authorizations," as it related to <br />extending the deadline after Rottlund had received concept <br />plan approval. Councilmember Ihlan interpreted this <br />language to provide an indefinite extension to the Contract <br />for Exclusive Negotiations with Rottlund Homes. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned: <br />1) Why extend at all? <br />2) How does this extension serve the best interest of <br />the City? <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing questioned what Councilmember Ihlan <br />proposed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan declined any proposal; referencing <br />Page 5 of the Contract for Exclusive Negotiations, where <br />the developer responsibilities were outlined, with <br />provisions regarding termination if steps were not met; <br />and opined that only the December 31, 2004 deadline <br />should be extended, not the March 31, 2004 deadline, <br />further opining that it was not in the City's best interest to <br />extend the dates on a blanket basis. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets reviewed the contract deadlines that <br />were in place, related to Council direction and terms - <br /> <br />Resolution 10259 <br />Amending the <br />Timeframes within <br />the Contract <br />Between the City of <br />Roseville and the <br />Rottlund <br />Companies in Light <br />of the EAW <br />Petition <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.